![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 |
We have to go back, Kate!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
|
You started the attacks in this thread. But yeah, K. whatever.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Slattern of the Swail
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,654
|
K. ! *happy*
Now. Why'd your sailor's look like imbiciles? coz, honey, they did.
__________________
In Barrie's play and novel, the roles of fairies are brief: they are allies to the Lost Boys, the source of fairy dust and ...They are portrayed as dangerous, whimsical and extremely clever but quite hedonistic. "Shall I give you a kiss?" Peter asked and, jerking an acorn button off his coat, solemnly presented it to her. —James Barrie Wimminfolk they be tricksy. - ZenGum |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Slattern of the Swail
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,654
|
actually, duckies, they looked like cheese surrendering monkeys.
i don;'t think Nelson or even Churchill would be cool with that--but, y;know, WhaTEver!
__________________
In Barrie's play and novel, the roles of fairies are brief: they are allies to the Lost Boys, the source of fairy dust and ...They are portrayed as dangerous, whimsical and extremely clever but quite hedonistic. "Shall I give you a kiss?" Peter asked and, jerking an acorn button off his coat, solemnly presented it to her. —James Barrie Wimminfolk they be tricksy. - ZenGum |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
We have to go back, Kate!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
We have to go back, Kate!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
|
Incidentally. It's worth pointing out that I can't find anything relating to this report on either the DfES site, or the BBC News: Education page. I suspect it's a load of bollocks.
[edit] I have now managed to track down the report, via the TES site. It's called Teaching Emotive and Controversial History: 3-19. It's basically a paper written by the Historical Association, which looks at teaching styles, possible constraints, possible solutions, issues around resources, issues around teacher training, good practice and bad practice etc. Its a 48 page report and on page 15, it cites a single, unnamed school as an example of some of the difficulties teachers might have teaching emotive and controversial history. Essentially it is listing that as its example of bad practice and then explores potential reasons why a teacher might have decided to avoid controversy. It in no way indicates a trend. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data...iles/RW100.pdf Last edited by DanaC; 04-09-2007 at 08:58 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|