The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-23-2006, 05:15 AM   #1
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
BobT, I agree with your assessment of the harm done exporting jobs.
Taxing foreign wages paid would be difficult, though.....just discerning when foreign workers are employed vs product/service bought from a foreign supplier.
If US companies have to pay tax on what foreign workers are paid, what about Walmart? Would they have to pay tax on the wages paid to the workers making the products they import?
I'm afraid your idea would be unworkable as it violates a bunch of treaties they've sold us out with.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2006, 04:23 PM   #2
BobT
we are fuel
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: cape coral, florida
Posts: 71
From just 11 of the 10 to 16 million Mexicans here, that's $3,000 a week or $150,000 a year, that's not being spent in this country...... that's not being invested in this country.
Right up there with walmart for sucking the country dry.[/quote]

what the mexicans workers in america are sending back is, quite frankly, not a significant amount when you compare it to the outsourcing of enitire factories full of workers to thrid world countries. the jobs outflow is staggering, and is encouraged by current government policy that does not tax the wages paid by american companies overseas. if american companies were forced to pay employment taxes on the wages that they pay to foreign workers and put those taxes into the Social Security fund for the retirement benefits of the american workforce we could make a difference on whether there is money there for your, my and other working americans when we are ready to retire.

this would also change the benefit analysis that american companies have to make when they justify moving a plant overseas. i don't claim that they would not make the same decision, but it would be important to those relocations that are maginal.
BobT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 04:28 PM   #3
Flint
Snowflake
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 13,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
...your idea would be unworkable as it violates a bunch of treaties...
Fuck treaties. We don't follow that shit anymore.
__________________
******************
There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there
it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your
expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever
gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio
Flint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2006, 04:56 PM   #4
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
We do when Bush & Co endorse them because they make his friends richer. :p
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.