At the request of BigV - Page 3

Clodfobble · 10-16-2006, 09:51 PM

What is the third photo, foot? (Post #25) I keep staring at it but my brain can't interpret it.

footfootfoot · 10-16-2006, 10:07 PM

If you really can't help yourself, I remembered this site where a few more of my images are uploaded. http://www.photo.net/photodb/member-...user_id=514069

footfootfoot · 10-16-2006, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clodfobble

What is the third photo, foot? (Post #25) I keep staring at it but my brain can't interpret it.

It is an abstract. I shan't tell you; I used to tell people and it ruined it for them.

To me, it is the cosmos.

Griff · 10-17-2006, 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by footfootfoot

It is an abstract. I shan't tell you; I used to tell people and it ruined it for them.

To me, it is the cosmos.

You fell down the stairs at the Corning Museum of Glass.

capnhowdy · 10-17-2006, 08:53 PM

damn good work... please keep it coming.

10-19-2006, 01:30 AM

Those photos are fine , but they are incredibly boring because one sees photos like that all over the place . People are blasé . My father who grew up in a tiny Welsh village is a passionate advocate of National Geographic . He took out a subscription long ago for his grandchildren . I think we have been receiving National Geographic for nigh on eighteen years . The children have never marvelled at the photographs .

breakingnews · 10-19-2006, 02:30 AM

Again, love the flowers, foot3. What delicate texture.

How was the NYC job?

Bullitt · 10-19-2006, 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddug

Those photos are fine , but they are incredibly boring because one sees photos like that all over the place . People are blasé .

Does berating on someone's obvious talent give you a hard-on or something?

footfootfoot · 10-19-2006, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddug

Those photos are fine , but they are incredibly boring because one sees photos like that all over the place . People are blasé . My father who grew up in a tiny Welsh village is a passionate advocate of National Geographic . He took out a subscription long ago for his grandchildren . I think we have been receiving National Geographic for nigh on eighteen years . The children have never marvelled at the photographs .

We're still waiting for you to make good on your word.

Of course, you'd know from boring. As for originality your trolling is anything but.

Spexxvet · 10-19-2006, 11:06 AM

Buddug doesn't sound like a chic, does it?

footfootfoot · 10-19-2006, 11:13 AM

It sounds more like buttplug to me.

footfootfoot · 10-19-2006, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by breakingnews

Again, love the flowers, foot3. What delicate texture.

How was the NYC job?

The Job went well, thanks. I forgot my gaffer's tape and just as I was finishing up the masking tape holding the duvetyne to the window gave out.

Perfect timing. Although I still haven't gotten the film back yet...
Not a problem with digital.

Right now I'm jonesing for this P2 in Taipei. I'm seriously thinking about misappropriating fundage...

breakingnews · 10-20-2006, 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by footfootfoot

Right now I'm jonesing for this P2 in Taipei. I'm seriously thinking about misappropriating fundage...

Too bad I can't find an address from their ebay storefront ... I'd track them down and try to work a little bargain action for you. (I like to call it the "fellow yellow hookup.")

But more than likely it's a shop on Bo Ai Lu ... that area is three square blocks of nothing but camera stores.

On a sorta related note, Canon/Nikon equipment is WAY expensive here (but Sigma/Tamron/Tokina is dirt cheap). I've been deciding between a Canon 70-200L f4 USM or a 70-300 IS USM ... both were almost $800. Redonkulous.

footfootfoot · 10-20-2006, 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by breakingnews

Too bad I can't find an address from their ebay storefront ... I'd track them down and try to work a little bargain action for you. (I like to call it the "fellow yellow hookup.")

But more than likely it's a shop on Bo Ai Lu ... that area is three square blocks of nothing but camera stores.

On a sorta related note, Canon/Nikon equipment is WAY expensive here (but Sigma/Tamron/Tokina is dirt cheap). I've been deciding between a Canon 70-200L f4 USM or a 70-300 IS USM ... both were almost $800. Redonkulous.

Hey cool!Thanks for the thought, I'd be honored to be a fellow yellow. I noticed that ebay store had a bunch of canon lenses that seemed just as much as b&h, I couldn't figure how a cherry looking p2 could be so cheap. Well, cheap is a relative word. That's a half a year's mortgage payments...

I'd take either of those lenses. How fast is the 70-300? And avoid the aftermarket glass. Friends don't let friends, etc.

breakingnews · 10-20-2006, 01:50 AM

The 70-300 is 4-5.6. I've been reading that the IS works amazingly well, and the lens itself is moderately heavy (for a compact zoom - 1.4 lbs), so should be pretty stable. At this point I'd rather have the extra 100mm and IS than a piece of L glass ... but then again, I really have no idea what I am doing. Me spending money on photo gear is like letting a blind person drive a car.

And I confess, I own third-party glass. I bought a Sigma 17-70 2.8 - it actually is a great lens. Fast, quiet, crisp focus. Only complaint is using AF for macro is a little inconsistent, but only when I am close to min focus distance.

10-16-2006, 10:07 PM	#32
footfootfoot To shreds, you say? Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet! Posts: 18,449	If you really can't help yourself, I remembered this site where a few more of my images are uploaded. http://www.photo.net/photodb/member-...user_id=514069 __________________ The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs

10-17-2006, 08:53 PM	#35
capnhowdy Blatantly Homosapien Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 6,200	damn good work... please keep it coming. __________________ Please type slowly. I can't read very fast............... and no holy water, please.

10-19-2006, 02:30 AM	#37
breakingnews Q_Q Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: somewhere in between Posts: 995	Again, love the flowers, foot3. What delicate texture. How was the NYC job? __________________ Gone crazy, be back never.

10-19-2006, 11:06 AM	#40
Spexxvet Makes some feel uncomfortable Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 10,346	Buddug doesn't sound like a chic, does it? __________________ "I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce

10-19-2006, 11:13 AM	#41
footfootfoot To shreds, you say? Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet! Posts: 18,449	It sounds more like buttplug to me. __________________ The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs

10-16-2006, 09:51 PM	#31
Clodfobble UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 20,012	What is the third photo, foot? (Post #25) I keep staring at it but my brain can't interpret it.

10-19-2006, 01:30 AM	#36
Buddug Guest Posts: n/a	Those photos are fine , but they are incredibly boring because one sees photos like that all over the place . People are blasé . My father who grew up in a tiny Welsh village is a passionate advocate of National Geographic . He took out a subscription long ago for his grandchildren . I think we have been receiving National Geographic for nigh on eighteen years . The children have never marvelled at the photographs .

10-20-2006, 01:50 AM	#45
breakingnews Q_Q Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: somewhere in between Posts: 995	The 70-300 is 4-5.6. I've been reading that the IS works amazingly well, and the lens itself is moderately heavy (for a compact zoom - 1.4 lbs), so should be pretty stable. At this point I'd rather have the extra 100mm and IS than a piece of L glass ... but then again, I really have no idea what I am doing. Me spending money on photo gear is like letting a blind person drive a car. And I confess, I own third-party glass. I bought a Sigma 17-70 2.8 - it actually is a great lens. Fast, quiet, crisp focus. Only complaint is using AF for macro is a little inconsistent, but only when I am close to min focus distance. __________________ Gone crazy, be back never.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)