Evolutionary Science-v- Creationism - Page 27

monster · 10-22-2007, 02:35 PM

Blimey -I expected a difference between the UK and US, but not that big!

Sundae · 10-22-2007, 03:39 PM

I am shamed by the UK's standing!
Blame the people available for surveying I say. Like me they are free during the day...

DanaC · 10-22-2007, 03:43 PM

Umm why shamed sg?

Sundae · 10-22-2007, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanaC

Umm why shamed sg?

Because we wasn't top o' course

10-22-2007, 04:02 PM

http://cellar.org/showthread.php?p=398191#post398191

DanaC · 10-22-2007, 04:51 PM

ahhhh I beg your pardon hon, of course that is shaming.

Happy Monkey · 12-01-2008, 04:53 PM

It was hard to decide whether to resurrect this thread, or put this in the humor thread:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy Comfort

Darwin theorized that mankind (both male and female) evolved in their pre-human state alongside each other over millions of years, both reproducing after their own kind before the ability to physically have sex evolved. They did this through "asexuality" ("without sexual desire or activity or lacking any apparent sex or sex organs"). Each of them split in half ("Asexual organisms reproduce by fission (splitting in half)."

ZenGum · 12-01-2008, 07:48 PM

I'm too lazy to search, was that posted here?

Happy Monkey · 12-01-2008, 08:41 PM

No, Roy Comfort is a creationist nutter. That's from his blog ( See the "put this" link).

Happy Monkey · 03-05-2009, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

It was hard to decide whether to resurrect this thread, or put this in the humor thread:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy Comfort

Darwin theorized that mankind (both male and female) evolved in their pre-human state alongside each other over millions of years, both reproducing after their own kind before the ability to physically have sex evolved. They did this through "asexuality" ("without sexual desire or activity or lacking any apparent sex or sex organs"). Each of them split in half ("Asexual organisms reproduce by fission (splitting in half)."

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenGum

I'm too lazy to search, was that posted here?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

No, Roy Comfort is a creationist nutter. That's from his blog ( See the "put this" link).

A follow up. He wrote a book.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy Comfort

"I simply expose atheistic evolution for the unscientific fairy tale that it is, and I do it with common logic. I ask questions about where the female came from for each species. Every male dog, cat, horse, elephant, giraffe, fish and bird had to have coincidentally evolved with a female alongside it (over billions of years) with fully evolved compatible reproductive parts and a desire to mate, otherwise the species couldn't keep going. Evolution has no explanation for the female for every species in creation,"

Happy Monkey · 01-14-2009, 11:59 AM

Another tossup. This is just the first bit:

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Kocsis' letter to the editor

One of the many problems with Darwin's theory of evolution pertaining to mankind is that neither Charles Darwin nor his worshippers take into account extra-terrestrial life.

xoxoxoBruce · 01-15-2009, 12:34 AM

I'll consider his argument that man didn't evolve from apes, when he shows me a man from another planet.

Phage0070 · 01-15-2009, 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

...when he shows me a man from another planet.

And then explains how that man spontaneously appeared without prior iterations. As far as I know Darwin's theory does not specify location at all.

xoxoxoBruce · 01-16-2009, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phage0070

And then explains how that man spontaneously appeared without prior iterations. As far as I know Darwin's theory does not specify location at all.

Reread what I said.

Phage0070 · 01-16-2009, 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Reread what I said.

Nothing about what you said precludes the possibility of extraterrestrial apes.

10-22-2007, 02:35 PM	#1
monster I hear them call the tide Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Perpetual Chaos Posts: 30,852	Blimey -I expected a difference between the UK and US, but not that big! __________________ The most difficult thing is the decision to act, the rest is merely tenacity Amelia Earhart

10-22-2007, 03:39 PM	#2
Sundae polaroid of perfection Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: West Yorkshire Posts: 24,185	I am shamed by the UK's standing! Blame the people available for surveying I say. Like me they are free during the day... __________________ Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac

12-01-2008, 07:48 PM	#8
ZenGum Doctor Wtf Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Badelaide, Baustralia Posts: 12,861	I'm too lazy to search, was that posted here? __________________ Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008. Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl.

12-01-2008, 08:41 PM	#9
Happy Monkey I think this line's mostly filler. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: DC Posts: 13,575	No, Roy Comfort is a creationist nutter. That's from his blog ( See the "put this" link). __________________ _________________ \|...............\| We live in the nick of times. \| Len 17, Wid 3 \| \|_______________\| [pics]

01-15-2009, 12:34 AM	#12
xoxoxoBruce The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 71,105	I'll consider his argument that man didn't evolve from apes, when he shows me a man from another planet. __________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.

10-22-2007, 03:43 PM	#3
DanaC We have to go back, Kate! Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 25,964	Umm why shamed sg?

10-22-2007, 04:02 PM	#5
rkzenrage Guest Posts: n/a	http://cellar.org/showthread.php?p=398191#post398191

10-22-2007, 04:51 PM	#6
DanaC We have to go back, Kate! Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 25,964	ahhhh I beg your pardon hon, of course that is shaming.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)