|
Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
View Poll Results: Juvenile Death Penalty | |||
Yes. Juveniles who commit capital crimes should be tried as adults, and their records should not be sealed | 10 | 43.48% | |
Yes, juveniles should be tried as adults, but only after a certain age. | 2 | 8.70% | |
No. Juveniles should not be tried as adults. They can still be rehabilitated due to their age. | 5 | 21.74% | |
I don't agree with any of these. I have my own opinion of how it should be done. (DO tell...) | 6 | 26.09% | |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-24-2004, 12:14 AM | #16 |
lobber of scimitars
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phila Burbs
Posts: 20,774
|
Whether or not a child (someone under the age of 18) should be tried as an adult depends on the crime, and also upon the child.
There are multiple layers in a determination of criminal competency ... that the individual knows the difference between right and wrong is just one aspect, being able to understand that nature of the criminal proceedings and participants and assist in one's own defenense is another. The greater determination, though, is whether the individual was suffering a defect of reason, such that at the time of the offense s/he didn't know that the action was a crime. The actual text of what's known as the M'Naughten Rule is: "...at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it that he did not know he was doing what was wrong." This, at least, is the basis of psychiatric competency for trial. A similar assessment occurs when a child is the perptrator of the crime. If the child in question is examined and found to be competent, then yes, I believe that the child can and should be tried as an adult, possibly facing the death penalty. Not all crimes are of such grievous nature to require this level of potential punishment. I do not think, though, that most children who are sentenced as adults should necessarily do time in adult prisons. There are high security juvenile facilities, and when the kid ages out of those, if there is time remaining on the sentence, they can go to the Big House. Sending kids to adult jails would not be economically feasible ... unless there are now enough of these cases to build a KiddieSuperMax facility. A child, even a major bad ass 16 year old, would likely have to be in protective custody, which ain't cheap. Part of what clouds the waters in dicussions like these, also, is that people think of examples like the kids described at the start of the thread ... rather than the more likely hardcore teenage gang member who engages in mayhem related either to that, or other "career" crime, like the half-dozen liquor and convenience store robberies that we see reported on the news every day. (please note: every state's statutes regarding competency to stand trial are different. My information relates primarily to Pennsylvania law)
__________________
wolf eht htiw og "Conspiracies are the norm, not the exception." --G. Edward Griffin The Creature from Jekyll Island High Priestess of the Church of the Whale Penis |
02-24-2004, 12:25 AM | #17 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Lancaster County Juvienile Court asked me to fill out a "Victims Report" about that kid hitting my car and taking off. Under what punishment do you feel this court should give the accused I wrote "I don't think juvenile court has the power to impose the death penalty".
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
02-24-2004, 12:26 AM | #18 |
Master Dwellar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,197
|
agreed wolf. (did you read my reference to the trial i was on? i just posted it and saw that you'd posted) anyway, i feel that they should go to Juvee and then be transferred to the big house at the appropriate age, unless they have the death penalty. then, well, they're isolated anyway. screw'em. give them their appeals and be done with it.
__________________
For your dreams to come true, you must first have a dream. |
02-24-2004, 12:28 AM | #19 | |
Master Dwellar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,197
|
Quote:
__________________
For your dreams to come true, you must first have a dream. |
|
02-24-2004, 12:36 AM | #20 | |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Quote:
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
|
02-24-2004, 12:53 AM | #21 | |
Master Dwellar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,197
|
Quote:
__________________
For your dreams to come true, you must first have a dream. Last edited by plthijinx; 02-24-2004 at 12:55 AM. |
|
02-24-2004, 01:26 AM | #22 |
bent
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: under the weather
Posts: 2,656
|
IMV, a child under a certain age is completely the responsibility of those to whom the child is entrusted. In the Columbine shooting that happened down the road from me, those kids had been making plans, building IEDs, stockpiling illegal guns and sawing barrels off. Where were the folks? Upstairs watching "Friends" reruns. Why were they up there? They wanted to make sure their kids had their 'privacy' (more likely, they didn't give a damn).
The kids, regardless of their motivation, killed people. They would've killed more if they hadn't committed suicide before their sick little plan was finished. If they had survived, there would be rioting in the streets if they were to go to "juvie" for a couple years. Despite their age, these kids were absolutely without remorse - people ask me sometimes why I believe in such a thing as demon possession. Exhibit A. What happened there was just sick. So, the kids are guilty of murder x[however many]. The parents should fall under a new statute which could be paraphrased thusly: "You didn't just fail to bring up your kids right. You failed to see that they got the help they needed to mitigate the damage they would cause the rest of society. You may not walk away from this like any other grieving parent. You must, for the rest of your natural lives, speak at a violence-prevention seminar, detailing exactly what you did wrong to help produce such evil, violent kids. You can't blame the video games - you know where the off switch is. You can't blame the guns - if you're not routinely turning over your violence-prone teenager's room, you not only disservice them, but the rest of us. You can't blame the school - they warned you about anti-social behavior. Let us worry about all that other stuff - it's out of your hands now. You stick to what you could have done to prevent it. On the 200th week of your seminar, you should have a pretty good idea of where you went wrong. At that point, we will decide whether you are capable of understanding your role. If so, have a happy life. The next phase of your sentencing is a monthly visit to the gravesites of your son, his friends, and all the people they killed. You will place a hand-written apology on the tombstone of each, explaining that you were a spineless coward who was more afraid of disciplining your child than of the horror your child could unleash. This will occur, unfortunately, only until it all cools down and we have the next flavor du jour murder. I hope that doesn't happen any time soon. Sending a kid to an adult prison will get them out of the way, but don't pretend it will rehab them. Don't ever let them out. Ever. They might have had a chance to do right, but some things can't be undone. Too bad they had to learn it firsthand, but so did their victims. Grr.
__________________
Sìn a nall na cuaranan sin. -- Cha mhór is fheairrde thu iad, tha iad coltach ri cat air a dhathadh |
02-24-2004, 01:40 AM | #23 |
Master Dwellar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,197
|
mrnoodle cool. i understand your point. not to knock you but do you have children yourself? if so then that validates your point even more so, if not then, well, call me when you do. i'm not trying to piss you off, really. you say that a child under a certain age is the responsibility of their parents. the columbine idiots were of the reasonable age to be eligable (IMHO) for the death penalty. shit dude, i'd hang them myself if they hadn't of gone out the "cheap way"
__________________
For your dreams to come true, you must first have a dream. |
02-24-2004, 06:56 AM | #24 | |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
Quote:
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
|
02-24-2004, 08:15 AM | #25 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
When you're making a bookcase shelf, and you fuck it up, you scrap it and start over.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
02-24-2004, 01:41 PM | #27 |
Professor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,788
|
The whole way we treat adolescents today is completely screwed up. The only way an adolescent can be treated as anything but a particularly large child is to commit a henious crime, at which point he's considered an adult.
|
02-24-2004, 02:01 PM | #28 | |||
"I may not always be perfect, but I'm always me."
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: In Sycamore's boxers
Posts: 1,341
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Freedom is not given. It is our right at birth. But there are some moments when it must be taken." ~Tagline from the movie "Amistad"~ "The Akan concept of Sankofa: In order to move forward we first have to take a step back. In other words, before we can be prepared for the future, we must comprehend the past." From "We Did It, They Hid It" |
|||
02-24-2004, 02:17 PM | #29 |
Shuttered and locked
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 97
|
Ok, everyone, just to make this clear, and much easier:
When I ask if you think that a "child" should be eligible for the death penalty, I'm talking about a child over age 10 and under age 21, who is in full possession of his/her faculties, and knew that the CAPITAL crime they committed was wrong (we're talking strictly capital crimes. Crimes that, for an adult, would be eligible for the death penalty).. We're talking about kids who've admitted it. We're talking about kids who've been convicted. We're talking about kids who aren't in the least bit retarded, mentally ill (and "mentally ill" in reference to the law is NOT the same thing as "mentally ill" in reference to psych/ology/iatry) or otherwise "unable to assist in their defense." And while we're at it, we all know adults who act and think like children. Nothing's wrong with them, they just never "grew up." Should we start holding people responsible by mental age rather than physical age? At what point does the danger posed to society by "children" outweigh the fact that they haven't hit 21 yet? What is it about the magic number 21 that makes someone an "adult" and therefore responsible, all of the sudden? Just a thought....
__________________
I find it kinda funny, I find it kinda sad...the dreams in which I'm dying are the best I've ever had.... Last edited by Shattered Soul; 02-24-2004 at 02:19 PM. |
02-24-2004, 04:01 PM | #30 |
The urban Jane Goodall
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,012
|
A couple of points to consider.
Institutionalizing a child will result in something resembling the way old-school practice of pederasty. Give up some ass and learn the ways to not get caught. Some of these facilities have better access to educational resources than anything they've had before. Prison used to be a place to fear, now it sometimes has better living conditions than they have at home. Also, someone mentioned that these kids shouldn't pay the price for poor parenting. Well, even the poorest parent instills in a child the idea of right and wrong. These chldren know that what they are doing is against the law, and thusly wrong. Not suffering any consequences for you behavior at home cannot completely excuse you from the consequences of your actions. You'd have to be like those children in Africa, in another thread, to have that excuse fly.
__________________
I have gained this from philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law. - Aristotle |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|