The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Home Base
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2014, 10:40 AM   #16
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
The author of that column took his tweet that babies have no religion, suggested that this was implying that babies have a default theological position of atheism and then argued against that 'implied' meaning, rather than the actual thing that Dawkins said.
He did twist the words to imply that Dawkins was claiming that babies pondered theology, but the fact is that a complete lack of theological position is still atheistic, so his argument would still fall flat if Dawkins had said what he claimed. If Dawkins had used the words "theological position", it would have been a silly construction to use, because of the implication of theologist babies, but he still would have been technically correct. If you're going to make fun of someone by twisting their words, you should make sure that the twisted words aren't also true.

And ridiculing the idea of "default language" explicitly supports Dawkins' actual point and wording. If you wouldn't count a baby as an "English speaker", why count them as "Catholic"?

And the "nationality" part is just completely incorrect.

Amazingly dumb quote.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 11:11 AM   #17
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Totally agree. And most of the 3000+comments it generated were basically arguing about the definition of atheism :P
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 05:15 PM   #18
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Wouldn't babies be agnostic (don't know, don't care) rather than atheist (don't believe), or am I confused on the definitions?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 05:17 PM   #19
Pico and ME
Are you knock-kneed?
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Middle Hoosierland
Posts: 3,549
Babies believe in a god. Mom, of course.
__________________
Jesse LaGreca in 2012

“Seven Deadly Sins: Wealth without work, Pleasure without conscience, Science without humanity, Knowledge without character, Politics without principle, Commerce without morality, Worship without sacrifice.” – Mahatma Gandhi
Pico and ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 05:20 PM   #20
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Gods = slaves.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 05:42 PM   #21
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Depends on your definition of atheism really. It has two meanings - Disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Disbelief is a conscious position, lack of belief may simply be an unconscious absence of belief. Literally it means 'without god' ( from Greek atheos, from a- 'without' + theos 'god'.)

So, the passive meaning of without belief would work for a baby.

Agnostic means: A person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God

So, no, agnostic would be too much of a considered position to be appropriate in this context.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2014, 05:56 PM   #22
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
OK, sounds logical.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 12:34 AM   #23
sexobon
I love it when a plan comes together.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 9,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
Depends on your definition of atheism really. It has two meanings - Disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Disbelief is a conscious position, lack of belief may simply be an unconscious absence of belief. Literally it means 'without god' ( from Greek atheos, from a- 'without' + theos 'god'.) ...
[bold mine]

The etiology behind the distinction is well established in science throughout leading research institutions. It's like people who are born without sight whom we call blind. For them, the world as we literally see it doesn't exist. They can appreciate some of it through their other senses, intellectually understand what sighted people tell them about the world beyond their available senses, even synthesize the world in their imaginations; but, that may not be anything like the reality of it and they might not believe it if they actually saw it.

Now we can look into the human organism and say there's a heart, there's some lungs, and there's a brain. We can even say look, there's a mutation in the RPE65 gene causing abnormal development of photoreceptor cells resulting in a blindness from birth we call Leber's congenital amaurosis. But we can't say look, there's a happiness or, there's a love or, there's a soul.

There are sights that some people can't see simply because of an unconscious lack of exposure and there are sights some people can't see because they were born without sight. Likewise, some people's lack of belief in God is simply an unconscious absence of belief while others who actually disbelieve were born without a soul. Human genetic mapping simply hasn't yet pinpointed the mutated gene responsible for the autosomal recessive disorder. The important thing to remember is that like blind people, @heists can be good people too.


Hope y'all enjoyed that little piece of fiction I just made up.
sexobon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 12:50 AM   #24
orthodoc
Not Suspicious, Merely Canadian
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,774
You're always good bedtime reading, sexobon.
__________________
The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated. - Ghandi
orthodoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 01:33 AM   #25
Big Sarge
Werepandas - lurking in your shadows
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the Deep South
Posts: 3,408
well all I know is some of y'all are going to Hell if you keep these heathen ways
__________________
Give a man a match, & he'll be warm for 20 seconds. But toss that man a white phosphorus grenade and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Big Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 08:12 AM   #26
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Button poetry?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.