![]() |
|
The Internet Web sites, web development, email, chat, bandwidth, the net and society |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 | |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Your Bartender
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Philly Burbs, PA
Posts: 7,651
|
I find it ironic that there's such outrage over the design of an RSS aggregator.
One of the points of RSS is to present you with raw information, information that you (or your software) will then slice, dice, and use as you prefer. By deciding to use RSS, you have already sidestepped a great many of the page design decisions made by the sites you subscribe to. But in presenting you this information, your RSS reader has to do... something. And so Google Reader imposes a set of decisions about design and layout on its users (decisions that most people agree are poor in its latest iteration). In the great Platonic Ideal Hypertextual Internet, this would be about as newsworthy as coverage of the fact that I've chosen to change the desktop wallpaper on my computer. But here in the gristly real-world Internet, web sites want to give us stuff in a particular format that they chose. Even a web site that owes its very existence to the concept of pulling the content of other web sites out with no particular formatting information. So, you don't like Google Reader? Use a different RSS aggregator. The very lack of alternatives, or perceived alternatives, is in itself telling. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
Quote:
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|