The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2010, 12:51 PM   #16
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenGum View Post
Is there much difference between this model of social security and a pyramid (ponzi) scheme? As long as the base keeps growing, no problem - growth slows, problem.
A big difference: there are only two levels, and you are guaranteed (provided you survive) a place at the "top".

There will always be people paying, so there will always be money for the people receiving. Different proportions of old to young may affect how much, but they will never run out.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 05:31 PM   #17
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey
there will always be money for the people receiving.
I see no practical difference between receiving a nominal sum that is a fraction of anybody's idea of living expenses, and not receiving anything. The part that makes it a ponzi scheme is the idea that everyone will receive something of value, which the government continues to insist upon.

Myself, I already made peace long ago with the idea that the program will implode before I'm old and I will receive (effectively) nothing. I choose to think of it as "welfare for old people," rather than a "system" I'm "paying in to," and that's fine.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 08:30 PM   #18
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Do you think that the ratio of old to young will rise indefinitely? The boomers will die eventually (If not, immortality would be a valid excuse to eliminate Social Secuity for the elderly).

And if the ratio of old to young, does rise indefinately, that means people are living longer, and the retirement age should be raised. Which brings the Social Security ratio back in balance.

I'm not sure what the difference between "welfare for old people" and a "system" I'm "paying in to" really is. It's welfare for old people who paid into the system.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 09:00 PM   #19
squirell nutkin
has a second hand user title
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: in a Nut House
Posts: 2,017
I think it's neither. It's a piggy bank that our government has plundered for whatever purpose they want. It's more like a tax. Soon we'll be paying an "earnings surcharge" in addition to our taxes and other forms of government extortion.
__________________
And now I'm finished posting.
squirell nutkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 09:21 AM   #20
Spexxvet
Makes some feel uncomfortable
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey View Post
Do you think that the ratio of old to young will rise indefinitely? The boomers will die eventually (If not, immortality would be a valid excuse to eliminate Social Secuity for the elderly).
...
If the boomers don't die on their own, they'll likely become hobos. Then they're just Shawnee fodder, and their numbers will quickly diminish. As an unexpected side effect, the price of dead hobos, and dead hobo meat will plunge. It's win/win/win.
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce
Spexxvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 09:23 AM   #21
Spexxvet
Makes some feel uncomfortable
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by squirell nutkin View Post
I think it's neither. It's a piggy bank that our government has plundered for whatever purpose they want. It's more like a tax. Soon we'll be paying an "earnings surcharge" in addition to our taxes and other forms of government extortion.
Or we could all just support our own old folks. Let me tell you - that's really costly. Wouldn't you like your mother-in-law living with you?
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce
Spexxvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 09:24 AM   #22
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
I claimed 7 hobos on my tax return this year. They're all gone now, except for The Hobo Who Wouldn't Die. Don't look at me, I have no idea what happened to them.
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 09:42 AM   #23
skysidhe
~~Life is either a daring adventure or nothing.~~
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spexxvet View Post
Or we could all just support our own old folks. Let me tell you - that's really costly. Wouldn't you like your mother-in-law living with you?

I've tried my mom living with me before. She really needs to go into an assisted living community.I really have been not enjoying keeping her issues organized and my own which, if I do not want to be one of those hobos,should be top priority.



When your kids get grown and you think everyone is going to be ok then your parents regress into childhood.I thought I was done with this. I am trying to keep the love but devising reasons to keep me on the line and my less than loving feelings is something I feel guilty about. Mostly when I am tired and don't want the phone to ring ONE MORE TIME.
skysidhe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:06 AM   #24
squirell nutkin
has a second hand user title
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: in a Nut House
Posts: 2,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnee123 View Post
I claimed 7 hobos on my tax return this year. They're all gone now, except for The Hobo Who Wouldn't Die. Don't look at me, I have no idea what happened to them.
They probably went to hobo camp. I wouldn't worry.
__________________
And now I'm finished posting.
squirell nutkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:19 AM   #25
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
"One time, at hobo camp..."
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:29 AM   #26
Pie
Gone and done
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,808
Well, I have no kids, no one who might give a shit about me when I hit 80... I guess I'll have to hope for some sort of Logan's Run dystopia to put me out of my misery.

Shaw, if I claim to be a hobo, will you do the honors?
__________________
per·son \ˈpər-sən\ (noun) - an ephemeral collection of small, irrational decisions
The fun thing about evolution (and science in general) is that it happens whether you believe in it or not.
Pie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:42 AM   #27
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
I would, but I'll be long gone before that, probably.

Unless of course the aliens let me stay and grant me eternal life.
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 12:52 PM   #28
Spexxvet
Makes some feel uncomfortable
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pie View Post
Well, I have no kids, no one who might give a shit about me when I hit 80... I guess I'll have to hope for some sort of Logan's Run dystopia to put me out of my misery.

Shaw, if I claim to be a hobo, will you do the honors?
Soilent Green Pie!
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce
Spexxvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:39 PM   #29
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey
I'm not sure what the difference between "welfare for old people" and a "system" I'm "paying in to" really is. It's welfare for old people who paid into the system.
The difference is, I don't receive welfare now, and I'm planning ahead and saving for retirement so that I hopefully won't need to rely on welfare when I'm old either. The implication of the "system you paid into" was that you would be well taken care of, moreso than just barely keeping you above the poverty line. It doesn't currently do that, and will do so even less in the coming decades.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:45 PM   #30
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
The difference is, I don't receive welfare now, and I'm planning ahead and saving for retirement so that I hopefully won't need to rely on welfare when I'm old either.
Hopefully.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.