The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2006, 04:54 AM   #1
NoBoxes
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
George W. Bush's most significant accomplishment was getting re-elected. This was due to political forces outside of direct control rather than leadership. It demonstrated to Americans that most of them can be fooled most of the time.

George W. Bush's most considerable failure was causing his political party to lose control of the Congress during his second term. This was due to a failure in leadership rather than political forces outside of direct control. It demonstrated to Americans that just because they put someone in a leadership position doesn't mean the person will live up to it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 10:56 AM   #2
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoBoxes
George W. Bush's most significant accomplishment was getting re-elected. This was due to political forces outside of direct control rather than leadership. It demonstrated to Americans that most of them can be fooled most of the time.
See the newpaper entitled Move Over, Hoover in this post.
Quote:
... we discussed whether George W. Bush is, conceivably, the worst U.S. president ever.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 10:57 PM   #3
Urbane Guerrilla
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoBoxes
George W. Bush's most significant accomplishment was getting re-elected. This was due to political forces outside of direct control rather than leadership. It demonstrated to Americans that most of them can be fooled most of the time.
NoBoxes, you were almost right. You'd've been all the way right had you named the correct President: Clinton demonstrated most of the electorate can be fooled often enough. But what he and his were selling, I wasn't buying -- I was smart enough never to vote for that man.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.
Urbane Guerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 11:30 AM   #4
lookout123
changed his status to single
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
Quote:
George W. Bush's most significant accomplishment was getting re-elected. This was due to political forces outside of direct control rather than leadership. It demonstrated to Americans that most of them can be fooled most of the time.
if by "outside of direct control" you mean "democrats failed to put forth a viable candidate", then yes you are correct. if the D's had run a candidate that was different from Bush in any positive, meaningful way he'd have run away with the race. instead americans were faced with an evil we know vs. evil we don't know race.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin
lookout123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 01:19 PM   #5
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Maybe thats why the "3rd" parties are growing so much in popularity. Too many people are disgusted with the far left and the far right without and "real" candidates to choose from. Perhaps if both parties were truly more interested in leading our country than stuffing their pockets, we'd have some tough decisions to make - like "Which of these is the better candidate?" I much prefer that to "Which one will eff up less?" I've been so disheartened by both the Republican and Democratic parties and their lapdogs that simply spew BS about how great or more idyllic their party is and how awful the other. Ours is by far the best nation on this planet (or any other) and it sickens me to know that those we entrust to lead it repeatedly disappoint and abuse the power we entrust them with.
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 01:53 PM   #6
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
hang on....just for clarification, do you consider the Dems to be 'far left'?
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 01:59 PM   #7
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
No, Dana they are the right wing -
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 02:13 PM   #8
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
then who is the 'far left' that people are sick of?
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 02:18 PM   #9
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC
then who is the 'far left' that people are sick of?
The Republicans - of course. But as smart as you are, I know you could have figured that out by process of elimination.
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 03:40 PM   #10
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
You've got it backwards, yesman. Dems/liberals are left, Reps/conservatives are right.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 03:52 PM   #11
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble
You've got it backwards, yesman. Dems/liberals are left, Reps/conservatives are right.
Gee really??? And I thought Dana was serious - I was only joking. We all know which extreme is which and that most of us fall somewhere in between.
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 04:49 PM   #12
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
My point yesman, is not which side is which; but rather, which ones are the extreme left? I have yet to see any evidence of 'far left' politics in the current or recent mainstream political scene.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 05:05 PM   #13
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
And hopefully you won't...far right either.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2006, 05:46 PM   #14
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Amazing how they have us arguing over a mythical political rope - hanging at both ends like a centenary. Myth puts highest points at an extreme left and extreme right. No wonder these extremists want gerrymandering.

Reality: a rope is hanging from a Ceiling where independents are at the top and where extremist Democrats and Republicans reside at the bottom end. Frayed rope at bottom contains the various ‘least intelligent’ politicians.

George Jr is nominated for the worst president ever (see Move Over, Hoover). This made obvious because a political agenda ("Americans don't do nation building", Saddam was involved in 11 Sept, anti-ballistic missile need, nuclear bunker busting bomb, war-time president, world wide terrorism, ‘god chose me as president’, Reagan proved that deficits don't matter, ‘god told me to attack Iraq’, etc) is more important that intelligent thought.

Rope hangs highest where intelligence resides - where decisions are made after first learning facts. The rope hangs low where intelligent thought would only confuse the brown shirts. Notice, to be intelligent, one must first do the work – learn facts – be educated – learn science – learn Military Science 101, etc. Low intelligence is a characteristic of extremist politicians who don’t even have sufficient brain power to climb that rope. To find intelligence, then find independents.

What did intelligent people recognize on 7 Nov 2006? That the president is wrong, a liar, and his war was lost years ago. Only intelligent people - those highest on the rope - could see that.

Who actually makes Congress work? Those who meet in that center aisle with their intelligent peers from the other party. Moderates mean higher intelligence - decisions based on facts and not based on political rhetoric.

The rope is not a centenary. Rope hangs from the roof where independents are up; political extremists are at the bottom.

Where on that rope do we find patriots? Obviously at the top because working for America is more important than working for the party. What are extremists doing - and deny? Extremists work first and foremost for the party (just like another party - communism); America be damned. To be a patriot, one must climb that rope.

We have a benchmark for where you exist on that rope. How long ago did you see “Mission Accomplished” was lost? How many times did you ask, “when are we going after bin Laden”.

Last edited by tw; 12-06-2006 at 08:20 PM.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006, 07:50 AM   #15
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC
My point yesman, is not which side is which; but rather, which ones are the extreme left? I have yet to see any evidence of 'far left' politics in the current or recent mainstream political scene.
I was referring to the general disdain - not of anything specifically current, but I fully expect it to start soon after the inaugurations.
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.