Who's the meanest user in The Cellar? - Page 2

Shocker · 05-04-2006, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayMcGee

they need love, not violence.....

todays motto.... don't turn your back on your Gay friends....

...because if you do turn your back on them, you are giving them a free shot at your asshole...

Kagen4o4 · 05-04-2006, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shocker

...because if you do turn your back on them, you are giving them a free shot at your asshole...

yes thankyou shocker, that was the joke

Flint · 05-05-2006, 10:40 AM

Sure, there is obvious stuff, but might that be a slippery slope?

If we use what is accepted by society as acceptable or not, as a yardstick to measure offensiveness, then at one point would a post about people of different races drinking out of the same water fountain have been banned? What about a post about people of the same gender having sexual relations? These are overly-dramatic examples, but, if you see what I mean, isn't offensiveness, at some point, relative, and where do you draw the line? It's a tightrope walk.

MaggieL · 05-05-2006, 11:42 AM

Offensiveness (or what's also been described here as "intolerably annoying", if memory serves) is of course a completely subjective judgement. We've been happy with how UT has managed it so far...and he's been doing it for a long time now. I know he's found it to be a tightrope walk at times.

I think UTs even-handedness and reasonable and fair judgement about such things is a key value proposition of The Cellar, and likely the central reason it has survived as long as it has.

So if you're in favor of a completely objective standard (something I consider mythical, but that's just my opinion), you should probably start your own board that implements one...where you can no doubt listen to such objections from others about your own style. Given how many free blogging engines there are, that's fairly easy on the "no-brainer" scale.

Of course then the task becomes attracting eyeballs, which brings us back to that "key value proposition" business again, and one reason attention whores get such rough treatment when they decide exploit the success of The Cellar to implement their own personal "Tragedy of the Commons".

Flint · 05-05-2006, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaggieL

I know he's found it to be a tightrope walk at times.

I don't envy his position. That was implied in my post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaggieL

if you're in favor of a completely objective standard

I'm not, and that's a huge "if" . . .

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaggieL

(something I consider mythical, but that's just my opinion)

Of course it's mythical. Doubting the existence of a objectively measured subjective concept carries more weight than just one person's opinion - such a measurement flies in the face of reason!

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaggieL

you should probably start your own board

. . . back to that huge "if" . . .
Based on any actual statements ever made by me, why would you think I should want to I start my own board? When have I complained about this one?

I was really dealing with this more on a theoretical level. You know, a discussion of ideas, as opposed to a pissing contest.

But I guess you can...

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaggieL

exploit the success of The Cellar

...for whatever flaots your boat.

MaggieL · 05-05-2006, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint

I was really dealing with this more on a theoretical level. You know, a discussion of ideas, as opposed to a pissing contest.

Theory and ideas arise from experience with the real world, and sooner or later they encounter it again on the output side. Some folks believe there's some sort of separation between what happens online and "the real world". In fact all of what happens online happens in "the real world"; online is a subset of reality, not distinct from it...which makes slogans like "it's only a message board" ring kinda hollow to some ears.

"Flying in the face of reason" isn't exactly a strong argument, since different people reason differently..."reasonable" is no more absolute than "offensive" is. I was trying to allow for the possibilty that your questioning the subjectivity of moderating judgements actually had a purpose beyond seeing your words in print.

And if you don't distinguish between debate and "a pissing contest", then you'll probably be dissatisfied with The Cellar.

SteveBsjb · 05-05-2006, 12:03 PM

The tragedy of the commons is a phrase used to refer to a class of phenomena that involve a conflict for resources between individual interests and the common good. The term derives originally from a parable published by William Forster Lloyd who was Drummond Professor at Oxford and a Fellow of the Royal Society, in his 1833 book on population. It was then popularized and extended by Garrett Hardin in his 1968 Science essay "The Tragedy of the Commons". See also the related real-world event of the 'Enclosure of the commons', and its attendant social problems, which may have inspired the content of the parable. The opposite situation to a tragedy of the commons is sometimes referred to as a tragedy of the anticommons.

SteveBsjb · 05-05-2006, 12:10 PM

Some people assume from actions (or posts) of another, that they "know" who they are dealing with.

Flint · 05-05-2006, 12:16 PM

Question: Does anybody know what the time-window is for making an edit? I just went back in ^^^up there^^^ to correct a spelling error that I missed in the first read-through, and now it looks like I changed my mind about the content, which I didn't.

SteveBsjb · 05-05-2006, 12:25 PM

I don't know, but it still says "flaot".

Flint · 05-05-2006, 12:30 PM

Damnit! That's what I went in for! But when it got to a "reason for edit" screen I tried to back out, but the "last edited" message showed up anyway. I don't want to be a late-editor.

xoxoxoBruce · 05-05-2006, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint

Damnit! That's what I went in for! But when it got to a "reason for edit" screen I tried to back out, but the "last edited" message showed up anyway. I don't want to be a late-editor.

I think if someone else has read the post it will say edited, it will if they've posted for sure. Why did you try to "back out" rather than just continuing?

SteveBsjb · 05-05-2006, 12:44 PM

pissing contest

1. a dispute that's a matter of one side's claims or bluster against the other's; a word feud; bickering; belly bumping. Contrary to some definitions, women are quite capable of(although usually less inclined to) "hold their own" in a pissing contest, which could morph into a shirt-shredding cat fight

MaggieL · 05-05-2006, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveBsjb

pissing contest...

Most of the time I find Wikipedia definitions higher quality than Urban Dictionary....unless you usually look up terms like "Cleveland Steamer".

Of course now some twit will claim that pointing that out is a "pissing contest".

Flint · 05-05-2006, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaggieL

now some twit will claim

:::crickets chirping:::

05-05-2006, 10:40 AM	#3
Flint Snowflake Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Dystopia Posts: 13,136	Sure, there is obvious stuff, but might that be a slippery slope? If we use what is accepted by society as acceptable or not, as a yardstick to measure offensiveness, then at one point would a post about people of different races drinking out of the same water fountain have been banned? What about a post about people of the same gender having sexual relations? These are overly-dramatic examples, but, if you see what I mean, isn't offensiveness, at some point, relative, and where do you draw the line? It's a tightrope walk. __________________ **************** There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio**

05-05-2006, 11:42 AM	#4
MaggieL in the Hour of Scampering Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Jeffersonville PA (15 mi NW of Philadelphia) Posts: 4,060	Offensiveness (or what's also been described here as "intolerably annoying", if memory serves) is of course a completely subjective judgement. We've been happy with how UT has managed it so far...and he's been doing it for a long time now. I know he's found it to be a tightrope walk at times. I think UTs even-handedness and reasonable and fair judgement about such things is a key value proposition of The Cellar, and likely the central reason it has survived as long as it has. So if you're in favor of a completely objective standard (something I consider mythical, but that's just my opinion), you should probably start your own board that implements one...where you can no doubt listen to such objections from others about your own style. Given how many free blogging engines there are, that's fairly easy on the "no-brainer" scale. Of course then the task becomes attracting eyeballs, which brings us back to that "key value proposition" business again, and one reason attention whores get such rough treatment when they decide exploit the success of The Cellar to implement their own personal "Tragedy of the Commons". __________________ "Neither can his Mind be thought to be in Tune,whose words do jarre; nor his reason In frame, whose sentence is preposterous..."

05-05-2006, 12:03 PM	#7
SteveBsjb Operations Operative Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Moved from Manhattan to Edgewater, NJ. Posts: 713	The tragedy of the commons is a phrase used to refer to a class of phenomena that involve a conflict for resources between individual interests and the common good. The term derives originally from a parable published by William Forster Lloyd who was Drummond Professor at Oxford and a Fellow of the Royal Society, in his 1833 book on population. It was then popularized and extended by Garrett Hardin in his 1968 Science essay "The Tragedy of the Commons". See also the related real-world event of the 'Enclosure of the commons', and its attendant social problems, which may have inspired the content of the parable. The opposite situation to a tragedy of the commons is sometimes referred to as a tragedy of the anticommons. __________________ "It's only an internet community."

05-05-2006, 12:10 PM	#8
SteveBsjb Operations Operative Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Moved from Manhattan to Edgewater, NJ. Posts: 713	Some people assume from actions (or posts) of another, that they "know" who they are dealing with. __________________ "It's only an internet community."

05-05-2006, 12:16 PM	#9
Flint Snowflake Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Dystopia Posts: 13,136	Question: Does anybody know what the time-window is for making an edit? I just went back in ^^^up there^^^ to correct a spelling error that I missed in the first read-through, and now it looks like I changed my mind about the content, which I didn't. __________________ **************** There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio**

05-05-2006, 12:25 PM	#10
SteveBsjb Operations Operative Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Moved from Manhattan to Edgewater, NJ. Posts: 713	I don't know, but it still says "flaot". __________________ "It's only an internet community."

05-05-2006, 12:30 PM	#11
Flint Snowflake Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Dystopia Posts: 13,136	Damnit! That's what I went in for! But when it got to a "reason for edit" screen I tried to back out, but the "last edited" message showed up anyway. I don't want to be a late-editor. __________________ **************** There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio**

05-05-2006, 12:44 PM	#13
SteveBsjb Operations Operative Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Moved from Manhattan to Edgewater, NJ. Posts: 713	pissing contest 1. a dispute that's a matter of one side's claims or bluster against the other's; a word feud; bickering; belly bumping. Contrary to some definitions, women are quite capable of(although usually less inclined to) "hold their own" in a pissing contest, which could morph into a shirt-shredding cat fight __________________ "It's only an internet community."

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)