12/13/2004: FCC investigates Olympics?

[Cyber Wolf]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

... don't forget that in the 17th century guys were about 5 ft tall, on average.

Just cuz a guy's short doesn't mean he sometimes has trouble walking in a straight line

And are we talking just the Meat or the Meat and Potatoes together? If we're talking about the total package then body size doesn't mean much...look at a male rat. His boys are HUGE proportionately. Of course, rats are kinda geared towards making as many babies as they can so he needs a large gene factory. But way back when, having a lot of kids was a good idea too what with farms to manage, kingdoms to inherit and the need for a non-fatal way to prove one's virility and higher infant mortality rates. Wouldn't be surprised if the stuff of a man 17th century and before (especially way before) were a little bigger, or possible the word is 'robust', than the stuff of a man today. Guys today need to try harder; there's fertility clinics and dildos to compete with

[Karenv]

Guys today need to contend with estrogens in the meat and dairy, xenoestrogens in plastics and pesticides. Even prenatally.

[glatt]

Originally Posted by Karenv

Guys today need to contend with estrogens in the meat and dairy, xenoestrogens in plastics and pesticides. Even prenatally.

So what you are saying is that Real Men don't eat beef.

[Karenv]

Actually beef is pretty good for making testosterone. But it is much better if it is grass-fed beef without estrogens in the feed.

Then Real Man can go and hunt or cut down pine trees in the spring when he can get lots of pine pollen, because the stuff is full of androgens including testosterone.

[xoxoxoBruce]

How about beef that's been fed pine trees?