08-23-2007, 03:28 PM | #211 |
I can hear my ears
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 25,571
|
well, Christianity to start.....but I think the real money was in sects. Catholicism, surely...Protestants later.....
I'm out of my depth when it gets detailed though.
__________________
This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality Embrace this moment, remember We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion ~MJKeenan |
08-23-2007, 04:17 PM | #212 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Most non-profits (tax exempt) do no charity work, or so little it doesn't amount to anything. That said, the tax code separates religious organizations into a separate category from charities and non-profits.
As a matter of fact, if you look at Tax code: TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 1 > Subchapter F > PART I > § 501, there are almost 30 different categories of tax exempt organizations. Things like Boy/girl Scouts, cemeteries, fraternities and the Rotary club are exempt, but I don't see them doing much charity work. I forgot to add the local gun club with over 3,000 members. No charity there.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. Last edited by xoxoxoBruce; 08-23-2007 at 04:20 PM. Reason: add gun club |
08-23-2007, 05:17 PM | #213 |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
I can understand a non-profit organization that, for example, operates as a club. However what is the purpose of defining a non-profit that has no assets and no income? Do its members at least pay dues for the refreshments? Is it only a fixture to legally protect its members from what happens at the party? I don't understand the reason for a non-profit organization that has zero assets.
|
08-23-2007, 09:45 PM | #214 | |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Quote:
|
|
08-23-2007, 09:54 PM | #215 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
I can only guess that most any group that falls in that category would handle at least some dues or donations to cover activities. This would shield them from accounting and tax liability for the treasury that's keep in an envelope in Mildred's underwear drawer.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
08-23-2007, 10:08 PM | #216 |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
See the web site posted by xoxoxoBruce. Maybe half of the non-profits are listed with zero assets and zero income. So the question is why would these organizations ever go throught the headaches of legal status and annual IRS filings when no money is even involved?
|
08-23-2007, 10:11 PM | #217 |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
To put numbers to this. Americans donate about $100 billion per year to religious organizations. That amounts to 1 in every 3 dollars donated by private Americans to all charities.
|
08-23-2007, 10:29 PM | #218 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Do those numbers come from claims on individual IRS returns, or from declarations of the recipients? I surprised it's only 1 in 3.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
08-24-2007, 06:13 AM | #219 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
Maybe they need legal status to limit liability.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
08-24-2007, 07:10 AM | #220 |
trying hard to be a better person
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 16,493
|
Jimbo, I thought you ignored rkz a hundred or so posts back?
I disagree with rkz on this point though. Churches in general provide a service to some people in the community who don't fit into the criteria social services require. Some people need the church and the leadership it forms. Some people are sheep and can't find their way by themselves. It costs money to help people. (not to mention buying candles) As to profits...well, obviously with attendance at churches dwindling, the 'profits' are surely dwindling comparitively. Anyway, have you tried running a church lately? What with cakes being on the outer (cause everyone's on the atkins diet) and not too many putting into the plate (cause there's too many theives in church), it's pretty hard to put the body of christ and wine on the table!
__________________
Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber |
08-24-2007, 09:29 AM | #221 |
I can hear my ears
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 25,571
|
i have weak ignore power. it lasted like 8 hours. meh.
__________________
This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality Embrace this moment, remember We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion ~MJKeenan |
08-24-2007, 12:45 PM | #222 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Giving USA Foundation at Indiana University's Center on Philanthropy NYU's Heyman Center for Philanthropy A book by an NYU author called "The Greater Good: How Philanthropy Drives the American Economy and Can Save Capitalism" An episode of Charlie Rose. |
|
08-24-2007, 12:45 PM | #223 |
Banned - Self Imposed
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
|
kept wonderin what they were sayin bout you huh?
|
08-24-2007, 01:03 PM | #224 | |
Makes some feel uncomfortable
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
|
Quote:
Providing service is common, and the provider is almost always taxed. For instance, a doctor provides a service, and pays taxes. Why should a church be different?
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce |
|
08-24-2007, 02:21 PM | #225 |
Hypercharismatic Telepathical Knight
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The armpit of the Universe... Augusta, GA
Posts: 365
|
Here we go...
The concept of separation of church and state, as outlined as a principle to hold by the penmen of the constitution (although, it still befuddles why they didn’t actually put it IN the constitution…), implies that the government should have NO control over any organization related to jebus, allah, Yahweh, FSM, or any religious figure whatsoever. As against the organized churches as I am, I’m going to have to say that taxation amounts to involvement. Also, because they have no ‘product’ (other than than smug look on the face of clergy when I tell them of MY religious choice) per se, the logistics are near impossible whil maintaining that separation. Do we tax them like an individual or a business? How do we decide which of their income is deductible? What about tax write offs? Do we enforce minimum wage for the priests? ‘Hands off’ is the best way to look at it. Just as long as you’re absolutely hands off. That means no city, state, or federal gov’t can tax them… but can likewise not give them money, not built city improvements based on their needs, nothing. Or my personal favorite… NOT LEGISLATE GOD WHEN IT COMES TO MY DRINKING HABITS! No alcohol on Sundays = unconstitutional…. Just had to throw that last bit in.
__________________
Hoocha, hoocha, hoocha... lobster. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|