The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-20-2013, 08:38 AM   #1
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adak View Post
That "wacko" was Obama, and no one else. Before he leaves office, he will have increased our national debt TWICE the amount of ALL THE PREVIOUS PRESIDENTS COMBINED.

[b]
Think about that.
We did think about that the last time you posted it, and we found that it was not adjusted for inflation. That makes it extremely dishonest.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 04:34 PM   #2
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adak View Post
<snip>

Any Commander-In-Chief, who refuses to give the veterans of foreign wars respect, is VERY questionable!
Any Commander-In-Chief, who refuses to allow veterans of foreign wars, access to their OWN war memorial for political gamesmanship, is an utter ass-wipe!
If Obama was a REAL Commander-In-Chief, he would apologize to those vets, and personally lead them around the memorial, in a return visit.
But he won't of course.
I had heard about the vets at the WWII Memorial, but had not followed the news.
So, when I came across this Washington Post pic, I thought of Adak.

Name:  VetsShutdown.jpg
Views: 423
Size:  89.3 KB

But then, don't these "vets" look sort of young to be WWII vets ?

Adak, must be so proud... and their parents must be too !

Last edited by Lamplighter; 10-21-2013 at 04:45 PM.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2013, 10:30 PM   #3
Adak
Lecturer
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamplighter View Post
I had heard about the vets at the WWII Memorial, but had not followed the news.
So, when I came across this Washington Post pic, I thought of Adak.

Attachment 45761

But then, don't these "vets" look sort of young to be WWII vets ?

Adak, must be so proud... and their parents must be too !
I am proud of these guys! Do you REALLY believe 80 year old vets can man-handle steel barricades?

Many of them can barely walk, or use a cane or a wheel chairs, furrkristSakes!

This was the ass-wipe Obama, operating WAY outside his purview, and we have every right to dissent and protest that action.

What? Did you think dissent and protest should be limited to 80 year olds? Maybe we should sit around and wring our hands out and shake our heads?
Adak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 08:04 AM   #4
infinite monkey
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
That isn't new: China has been working towards owning us for years and years.

I, for one, won't welcome our creepy sneaky overlords.
infinite monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 08:25 AM   #5
Spexxvet
Makes some feel uncomfortable
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by infinite monkey View Post
That isn't new: China has been working towards owning us for years and years.

I, for one, won't welcome our creepy sneaky overlords.
Don't worry, our super massive over the top excessive superfluous defense contractor piggy bank military will keep them from owning us.
Attached Images
 
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce
Spexxvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 08:48 AM   #6
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Except all our machinery uses chips and ICs they manufacture, and they have a secret backdoor kill switch built in to each one.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 08:49 AM   #7
henry quirk
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
"So you love it that extremists are playing right into China's hand. "

Nope. What I loved what the possibility folks might see for themselves they don't need as much 'governing' as they're told they do.

What I loved was the possibility folks might see the politicians need them a helluva lot more than they need the politicians.

What I loved was the possibility that ludicrous amounts of scrip might stop being spent on horseshit.

China: fuck 'em...what they gonna do? Without the U.S., China goes back to being just a Third World hole.

All moot anyway...*shrug*
henry quirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 08:52 AM   #8
henry quirk
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
"This was the most boring government shutdown EVER!"

"you anti-american fuck"

HA!
henry quirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 09:17 AM   #9
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by henry quirk View Post
"So you love it that extremists are playing right into China's hand. "

Nope. What I loved what the possibility folks might see for themselves they don't need as much 'governing' as they're told they do.

What I loved was the possibility folks might see the politicians need them a helluva lot more than they need the politicians.

What I loved was the possibility that ludicrous amounts of scrip might stop being spent on horseshit.

China: fuck 'em...what they gonna do? Without the U.S., China goes back to being just a Third World hole.

All moot anyway...*shrug*
Great. Right up until the part where a bunch of children actually starve for lack of food aid programmes; old people actually freeze in the coming winter because they cannot heat their homes, and a rash of small businesses are crippled by the soaring cost of borrowing.

You may not need that much government, but there are a fuck of a lot of people who do in fact need government.

Government didn't expand because it is some hulking beast wanting more and more. It expanded because the alternative to doing so would leave some people for dead. It expanded to fill the gaps left by libertarian and free market ideologies. It expanded to facilitate the broadening out of society's benefits to all Americans and not just those who successfully rode the financial surf.

Now, I daresay you'd be quite comfortable with all that. Survival of the fittest, no passengers, no such thing as fairness idyll.

I honestly don't know what it is you expect to happen if the government were to suddenly shrink to the bone.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 09:35 AM   #10
henry quirk
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
"Great. Right up until the part where a bunch of children actually starve for lack of food aid programmes; old people actually freeze in the coming winter because they cannot heat their homes, and a rash of small businesses are crippled by the soaring cost of borrowing."

I get it: I (and folks like 'me') are supposed to carry 'them' because they can't carry themselves.

Make me.

#

"You may not need that much government, but there are a fuck of a lot of people who do in fact need government."

And that’s 'their' damned problem.

#

"Government didn't expand because it is some hulking beast wanting more and more."

'It' expanded 'cause the mercenary wanted more (more power, more control). To that end: generations were taught (are being taught) that bigger government is better government, that governance of the minutia of living is a necessity, and that no individual can do without the 'guidance' of 'authority.

Utter horseshit.

#

"...the alternative to doing so would leave some people for dead"

An unsavory truth (fact): some folks need to die.

If X can't fend for him- or her-self, and X has no one who WANTS to help him or her, then X needs to go.

To demand I care for X is theft (of my time, resources, and self...fuck that noise).

That folks like you have to force folks like me is theft, Dana.

No other assessment makes sense.

#

"I honestly don't know what it is you expect to happen if the government were to suddenly shrink to the bone.”

First, it'll never "suddenly shrink to the bone". Like smack in the vein: it's 'needed'.

Second, if it did "suddenly shrink to the bone" I expect lots of folks to suffer...some die; some make it through (and are better for it).

#

"Survival of the fittest"

HA!

You write it as though it were a bad phrase.

It's not bad or good...just what 'is'.

Folks like you wanna insulate themselves from it...good luck with that.

#

Tell you what, Dana: if children starving and old people freezing bother you so much, devote your time, resources, and 'self' to saving them.

Why do 'I' have to participate?

Last edited by henry quirk; 10-17-2013 at 09:44 AM.
henry quirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 09:39 AM   #11
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Now that the world has seen that Henry Quirk was right all along,
we can look foreward to February 7th, 2014.

Yesterday, when the Senate passed it's Bill to end this shutdown and debt ceiling fiasco,
Harry Reid made gave a short speech trending towards conciliation and optimism.
Not so for the Senate Minority Leader...

Senator Mitch McConnell's "conciliation" speech drew a bright new red line on the floor.
The GOP will begin it's "conversation" in the super-committee at
last March's $986 billion sequester (aka the Budget Control Act (BCA).
It will be the new Pavlovian war cry of the GOP.
In other words, Obamacare (ACA) becomes just one ribbon on the GOP's BCA battle flag.

Name:  Sequester_2013.jpg
Views: 390
Size:  93.5 KB

Here is a link to the current effect of sequestration by state...

The Texas Tribune

Ryan Murphy
2/26/13

Interactive: Sequester Cuts by State

Quote:
<snip>
Using the data made available for every state plus the District of Columbia
(yes, we opened and collected numbers from all 51 PDFs),
we have prepared an interactive that makes it easy to compare the White House's numbers for each state. Select a sequester cut from the drop-down to view a different chart.

Name:  SequesterByState.jpg
Views: 358
Size:  61.1 KB
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 09:33 AM   #12
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Good news everybody!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rep. John C. Fleming (R-LA)
“But that will get us into Round 2. See, we’re going to start this all over again.”
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 10:13 AM   #13
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
How strange that you would use English to communicate that. Shouldn't you be making up a new language, rather than participate in something that the entire culture has developed over a period of many centuries of deep cooperation, a tie that binds us together so strongly?
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 02:25 PM   #14
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Quote:
"Society has a cost and that cost is cooperation and mutual support."

Society is nuthin' but a word for a buncha folks living in close proximity to one another and not killing each other.

It becomes 'jail' when communitarians (Left and Right) decide that the one owes the many sumthin' more than not stealing and not killing.
Again with the English! You're really one of us aren't you?
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2013, 02:31 PM   #15
henry quirk
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
again: so stupid

"You're really one of us aren't you?"

I never claimed to be sumthin' other than a human man living in America (like a whole whack of other human men).

As I say: missin' my point (BIG time).
henry quirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.