Do guys really care about a girls sexual history? - Page 12

morethanpretty · 10-05-2006, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aliantha

I'm surprised anyone is still responding to this twerp.

Because this

is our 2nd most favorite activity.

Aliantha · 10-05-2006, 11:01 PM

Well foot, I'm pretty sure he's not that Canadian guy because I've had similar discussions with him about this sort of thing and his views do not concur with bmw's. I suppose he could be just trying to yank people's chains though, in which case, he's doing a good job of it. Again though, I don't think it's him.

footfootfoot · 10-05-2006, 11:51 PM

I don't think it's him, just that there is a similarity in keeping people hooked into his crap, and his being willing to keep it up after most people would have said yeah whatever

10-06-2006, 01:12 PM

Lot of complaint but little added insights.

No real refutation, just insults.

Sundae Girl, rapes was addressed in prior posts.

That’s the rub on this or other message boards. Poster fail to carry on a thought or point. A discussion is based on compounded information not regurgitation.

Women can become sexually addicted as well as have all the traits of male sexuality, but they are an EXTREME minority.

Why not save your false assumptions and useless reprints of my quotes without adding dime-one to the topic. You “poster” claim the high ground yet talk nothing but trash.
I’m this I’m that, spare me the juvenile tit-4-tat.

Got something to add, add it.

Take issue with the point, read the post and then take it on.

I am ABSOULTLY not impress with name calling and self-serving disparaging comments employed to evade the topic.

yesman065 · 10-06-2006, 01:44 PM

No evasion here. I just disagree with your "opinions" and I continue to do so. Your opinions are faulty, illogical and antiquated. And that is nothing more than my opinion. I no longer feel the need nor point in arguing about it. Its like trying to convice someone in the 13th century that, indeed, the world is round.
Oh and by the way - it is.

10-06-2006, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yesman065

No evasion here. I just disagree with your "opinions" and I continue to do so. Your opinions are faulty, illogical and antiquated. And that is nothing more than my opinion. I no longer feel the need nor point in arguing about it. Its like trying to convice someone in the 13th century that, indeed, the world is round.
Oh and by the way - it is.

You need another slogan for your user name.

Trilby · 10-06-2006, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmwmcaw

You need another slogan for your user name.

Gasp! You're not engaging in name calling, are you? Gasp!

10-06-2006, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brianna

Gasp! You're not engaging in name calling, are you? Gasp!

HUH?

I'm not the one making the claim Yesman makes, I am simply stating his slogan is unjustified. Now how is taking that position "name calling?" Its no wonder your having a difficult time with my post, you don't understand what your reading

Trilby · 10-07-2006, 08:14 AM

[quote=bmwmcaw I am simply stating his slogan is unjustified. [QUOTE]

You're the judge? YOU know best? Your statements are laughable to say the least, your thinking warped and your mind a dank and dreary place.

I'm done with you, you misogynistic ape! Done!

(howzat for name calling? And I didn't even mention your lack of basic spelling and grammar! You're welcome.)

yesman065 · 10-06-2006, 04:02 PM

I stand by my last post -

Flint · 10-06-2006, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmwmcaw

I am simply stating his slogan is unjustified. Now how is taking that position "name calling?"

You implied he isn't a "Deep Thinker" . . . so you were either name-calling (then) or hair-splitting (now). Take your pick.

Trilby · 10-07-2006, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flint

You implied he isn't a "Deep Thinker" . . . so you were either name-calling (then) or hair-splitting (now). Take your pick.

Oh, ps--thanks for trying to explain it to him, Flint, but I don't think he grasps abstract meanings or concepts.

9th Engineer · 10-07-2006, 02:44 PM

Quote:

I mean we all have done things we're not proud of

I would judge someone taking this attitude much differently than someone taking the attitude that they had every right to do what they did and don't give a damn what you think about it (which seems to be commonly voiced here). A big chunk of the rhetoric being thrown by Shawnee and the like is that anyone who thinks that a persons history has any impact on the here and now is a bigot and ought to just bring themselves up to date and shut up. That's really the attitude I've been fighting against here.
I believe that everyone is a conglomaration of all past experiences, none of which ever go away and all of which are relevent to predicting a persons future behavior. We got sidetracked for a while on whether or not everyone cares about the predicted outcome, but none-the-less it is there.
Even if you love someone deeply you would have to be a complete fool to disregard their past. Doing so will lead to nothing but heartache and leave you on the side of the road wondering "why?!?

...". Love by itself, especially any love less than a decade old and strong, is the weakest hinge on which to hang a commitment like marrige. Like it or not, love does not conquer all. The only place this exists is in fantasy and movie scripts.
In the end, you have to base your choices on what people do, not what they say. We often take that advice in dealing with people in other ways, it also applies to relationships, commitments, and sex.

bbro · 10-06-2006, 04:20 PM

You know, I was going to post a whole bunch of stuff just rebutting all of the stuff that has been said by bmw, but then I got to thinking....You gets your stats from Cosmo (Oh, yea, that’s scientific and no, it wouldn’t make a difference if it was coming from Maxim) and the Kinsey (not Kinsley) report which is over 50 years old, but the CDC data from 2005 is not credible because all people lie no matter what. Well, then how are your arguments so truthful? Why can’t people lie to Cosmo and Kinsey *gasp!*

He doesn't concede to any valid points being made, there have been many. It is like arguing with a child (not name calling, but a comparison). They are right no matter what is presented to them, ignoring valid statistics for those that fuel your argument. You make it impossible to even debate the issue or converse about it because no one is right but you.

All I have to say on the subject is that to have this much hate for women, someone, some where must have fucked you up royally, and for that, I feel sorry for you.

cowhead · 10-06-2006, 05:52 PM

heh... geez I ought to plumb the depths of the cellar more often than I have been.. might need some cleaning out down here.. anywhoo, not that the original thread topic is in any way shape or form still being addressed.. having degenerated into name calling and hair splitting (which I have to say is 1/2 the fun of the internet). no. I do not believe that a persons sexual past/history ought ot be a point of contention in a relationship.. I mean we all have done things we're not proud of.. some more times than others, then again.. If you worked in a donkey show in mexico. .I think that ought to come up at some point fairly ealry in the relationship. then again one never knows what another person might find attractive or stimulating? so I suppose it depends on what the nature of the relationship is. (serious/fuck-buddies etc.) and what the presons involved might view as a 'future' and in what context that relationship evolves..... anywhoo! cat on lap typing difficult must go..

10-05-2006, 11:01 PM	#2
Aliantha trying hard to be a better person Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Brisbane, Australia Posts: 16,493	Well foot, I'm pretty sure he's not that Canadian guy because I've had similar discussions with him about this sort of thing and his views do not concur with bmw's. I suppose he could be just trying to yank people's chains though, in which case, he's doing a good job of it. Again though, I don't think it's him. __________________ Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber

10-05-2006, 11:51 PM	#3
footfootfoot To shreds, you say? Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet! Posts: 18,449	I don't think it's him, just that there is a similarity in keeping people hooked into his crap, and his being willing to keep it up after most people would have said yeah whatever __________________ The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs

10-07-2006, 08:14 AM	#9
Trilby Slattern of the Swail Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 15,654	[quote=bmwmcaw I am simply stating his slogan is unjustified. [QUOTE] You're the judge? YOU know best? Your statements are laughable to say the least, your thinking warped and your mind a dank and dreary place. I'm done with you, you misogynistic ape! Done! (howzat for name calling? And I didn't even mention your lack of basic spelling and grammar! You're welcome.) __________________ In Barrie's play and novel, the roles of fairies are brief: they are allies to the Lost Boys, the source of fairy dust and ...They are portrayed as dangerous, whimsical and extremely clever but quite hedonistic. "Shall I give you a kiss?" Peter asked and, jerking an acorn button off his coat, solemnly presented it to her. —James Barrie Wimminfolk they be tricksy. - ZenGum

10-06-2006, 05:52 PM	#15
cowhead halve your cake and eat it too. Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Georgia.. by way of Lawrence Kansas Posts: 1,359	heh... geez I ought to plumb the depths of the cellar more often than I have been.. might need some cleaning out down here.. anywhoo, not that the original thread topic is in any way shape or form still being addressed.. having degenerated into name calling and hair splitting (which I have to say is 1/2 the fun of the internet). no. I do not believe that a persons sexual past/history ought ot be a point of contention in a relationship.. I mean we all have done things we're not proud of.. some more times than others, then again.. If you worked in a donkey show in mexico. .I think that ought to come up at some point fairly ealry in the relationship. then again one never knows what another person might find attractive or stimulating? so I suppose it depends on what the nature of the relationship is. (serious/fuck-buddies etc.) and what the presons involved might view as a 'future' and in what context that relationship evolves..... anywhoo! cat on lap typing difficult must go.. __________________ no my child.. this is not my desire..I'm digging for fire.

10-06-2006, 01:12 PM	#4
bmwmcaw Guest Posts: n/a	Lot of complaint but little added insights. No real refutation, just insults. Sundae Girl, rapes was addressed in prior posts. That’s the rub on this or other message boards. Poster fail to carry on a thought or point. A discussion is based on compounded information not regurgitation. Women can become sexually addicted as well as have all the traits of male sexuality, but they are an EXTREME minority. Why not save your false assumptions and useless reprints of my quotes without adding dime-one to the topic. You “poster” claim the high ground yet talk nothing but trash. I’m this I’m that, spare me the juvenile tit-4-tat. Got something to add, add it. Take issue with the point, read the post and then take it on. I am ABSOULTLY not impress with name calling and self-serving disparaging comments employed to evade the topic.

10-06-2006, 01:44 PM	#5
yesman065 Banned - Self Imposed Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,847	No evasion here. I just disagree with your "opinions" and I continue to do so. Your opinions are faulty, illogical and antiquated. And that is nothing more than my opinion. I no longer feel the need nor point in arguing about it. Its like trying to convice someone in the 13th century that, indeed, the world is round. Oh and by the way - it is.

10-06-2006, 04:02 PM	#10
yesman065 Banned - Self Imposed Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,847	I stand by my last post -

10-06-2006, 04:20 PM	#14
bbro Insert witty comment here Join Date: May 2004 Location: Raleigh, NC Posts: 2,182	You know, I was going to post a whole bunch of stuff just rebutting all of the stuff that has been said by bmw, but then I got to thinking....You gets your stats from Cosmo (Oh, yea, that’s scientific and no, it wouldn’t make a difference if it was coming from Maxim) and the Kinsey (not Kinsley) report which is over 50 years old, but the CDC data from 2005 is not credible because all people lie no matter what. Well, then how are your arguments so truthful? Why can’t people lie to Cosmo and Kinsey gasp! He doesn't concede to any valid points being made, there have been many. It is like arguing with a child (not name calling, but a comparison). They are right no matter what is presented to them, ignoring valid statistics for those that fuel your argument. You make it impossible to even debate the issue or converse about it because no one is right but you. All I have to say on the subject is that to have this much hate for women, someone, some where must have fucked you up royally, and for that, I feel sorry for you.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)