There are no illegal immigrants in America - Page 10

Aliantha · 01-01-2008, 06:10 PM

And you don't think the fact that most of the desirable areas to live already have ownership claims on them will cause conflict?

Remember, when the huge influx of immigrants arrived, much of the land was available, if not for free, then certainly at bargain basement prices.

Who do you think is going to practically give away their nice piece of land to a huge influx of new immigrants?

Don't you think these issues might contribute to the need for immigration laws?

Regardless of whether you want it to be true or not, all countries only have so much room to support a certain number of people. Once you go over that you risk civil war at the least.

This argument you have, whether it's correct or not, doesn't matter. The current state of the world does not allow for it unless you want to completely destroy your country.

Aliantha · 01-01-2008, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aliantha

And you don't think the fact that most of the desirable areas to live already have ownership claims on them will cause conflict?

Remember, when the huge influx of immigrants arrived, much of the land was available, if not for free, then certainly at bargain basement prices.

Who do you think is going to practically give away their nice piece of land to a huge influx of new immigrants?

Don't you think these issues might contribute to the need for immigration laws?

Regardless of whether you want it to be true or not, all countries only have so much room to support a certain number of people. Once you go over that you risk civil war at the least.

This argument you have, whether it's correct or not, doesn't matter. The current state of the world does not allow for it unless you want to completely destroy your country.

Do you have any response to this Radar or are you going to just continue the pissing contest with merc?

Radar · 01-01-2008, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aliantha

Do you have any response to this Radar or are you going to just continue the pissing contest with merc?

There was really nothing to respond to. My thread isn't about whether or not government SHOULD have the power to make immigration laws.

I'm stating the FACT that it DOES NOT have any Constitutional authority to create or enforce them right now.

TheMercenary · 01-01-2008, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aliantha

Do you have any response to this Radar or are you going to just continue the pissing contest with merc?

He can't because he can't support any of those thoughts with facts.

Radar · 01-01-2008, 06:14 PM

What would you know of cogent arguments? I've already nailed your sorry ass to the wall, and provided indisputable facts. Your arguments amount to, "nuh uh....the government can make those laws...see here's one right here" as though that proves anything other than your own stupidity.

Also, I've made no threats. I'm hardly likely to be in a room with you so spitting in your face as you've spit in the faces of the founders is a moot point.

The fact remains that I'm right, and I've proven it, and you're wrong, and you've proven nothing. Nothing you say or do will change that. No amount of denials will change the fact that our federal government has absolutely zero authority to create or enforce immigration laws and that everyone who claims otherwise is a liar.

TheMercenary · 01-01-2008, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar

Were you this big of a cry baby on Active Duty as well? Did they kick you out?

Radar · 01-01-2008, 06:33 PM

No, I've never been a crybaby; not when I was on active duty, not now, and not ever. I served my time in the military and I got out. I didn't sign up for another 4 years. I didn't enjoy working for half the pay I can get in the private sector or working for people who were morons or who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution when they hadn't read it or understood it...like you.

I'm earning more than most generals in the military now and I'm certainly a better man, and a better American than you'll ever be.

TheMercenary · 01-01-2008, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar

No, I've never been a crybaby; not when I was on active duty, not now, and not ever. I served my time in the military and I got out. I didn't sign up for another 4 years. I didn't enjoy working for half the pay I can get in the private sector or working for people who were morons or who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution when they hadn't read it or understood it...like you.

I'm earning more than most generals in the military now and I'm certainly a better man, and a better American than you'll ever be.

[yawn] yea, I had punks like you court martialed all the time. No biggie, have a great fantasy life.

busterb · 01-01-2008, 06:54 PM

In my rabbit assed mind, I wonder, does Radar really believe, or is he just yanking folks chain? His last post about all for the money kinda sucks to us VETS.

TheMercenary · 01-01-2008, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by busterb

In my rabbit assed mind, I wonder, does Radar really believe, or is he just yanking folks chain? His last post about all for the money kinda sucks to us VETS.

Oh he believes in it, in his little fantasy world. I saw hundreds of people like him over my career. Never would have made it past 4 years. What ever...
We know what we did and how we served. We don't need some delusional punk to tell us about what we believe or did in service to this country.

{next slide please}

Radar · 01-01-2008, 07:06 PM

How cute. The pathetic moron who supports violating the Constitution and who lives in his own dream world where Congress has powers prohibited to it by the Constitution, calls me a punk. LOL!!!

Your service means nothing if you claim the federal government has any authority over immigration after being spoonfed the FACT that the Constitution prohibits it. I served with honor and distinction and left with my honorable discharge to do more challenging things while continuing to uphold my oath to defend the Constitution from foreign and domestic enemies of the Constitution...like you.

TheMercenary · 01-01-2008, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar

Your service means nothing if you claim the federal government has any authority over immigration after being spoonfed the FACT that the Constitution prohibits it.

Son, you are no judge of that. 4 years and out hardly qualifies you to judge the rest of us.

:

Radar · 01-01-2008, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

Son, you are no judge of that. 4 years and out hardly qualifies you to judge the rest of us.

:

My 4 years makes me as much of a veteran as someone with 30 years and I'm certainly better educated, more honest, more patriotic, and have more integrity than you or a million more like you combined.

I certainly can judge those who support violating the U.S. Constitution and who have lied when they took an oath to the American people like you.

I've destroyed your laughable attempts to claim immigration laws are valid

and I've shown that you are nothing more than an annoying little turd.

classicman · 01-01-2008, 07:01 PM

Radar, that image you posted implies that a woman who speaks her mind should be beaten. YOU are an asshole.

TheMercenary · 01-01-2008, 07:04 PM

You know who else earns more than a general!?!?!?

Whores, drug dealers, shister religious leaders, and John Edwards.

01-01-2008, 06:10 PM	#1
Aliantha trying hard to be a better person Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Brisbane, Australia Posts: 16,493	And you don't think the fact that most of the desirable areas to live already have ownership claims on them will cause conflict? Remember, when the huge influx of immigrants arrived, much of the land was available, if not for free, then certainly at bargain basement prices. Who do you think is going to practically give away their nice piece of land to a huge influx of new immigrants? Don't you think these issues might contribute to the need for immigration laws? Regardless of whether you want it to be true or not, all countries only have so much room to support a certain number of people. Once you go over that you risk civil war at the least. This argument you have, whether it's correct or not, doesn't matter. The current state of the world does not allow for it unless you want to completely destroy your country. __________________ Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber

01-01-2008, 06:14 PM	#5
Radar Constitutional Scholar Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Ocala, FL Posts: 4,006	What would you know of cogent arguments? I've already nailed your sorry ass to the wall, and provided indisputable facts. Your arguments amount to, "nuh uh....the government can make those laws...see here's one right here" as though that proves anything other than your own stupidity. Also, I've made no threats. I'm hardly likely to be in a room with you so spitting in your face as you've spit in the faces of the founders is a moot point. The fact remains that I'm right, and I've proven it, and you're wrong, and you've proven nothing. Nothing you say or do will change that. No amount of denials will change the fact that our federal government has absolutely zero authority to create or enforce immigration laws and that everyone who claims otherwise is a liar. __________________ "I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death." - George Carlin

01-01-2008, 06:33 PM	#7
Radar Constitutional Scholar Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Ocala, FL Posts: 4,006	No, I've never been a crybaby; not when I was on active duty, not now, and not ever. I served my time in the military and I got out. I didn't sign up for another 4 years. I didn't enjoy working for half the pay I can get in the private sector or working for people who were morons or who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution when they hadn't read it or understood it...like you. I'm earning more than most generals in the military now and I'm certainly a better man, and a better American than you'll ever be. __________________ "I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death." - George Carlin

01-01-2008, 06:54 PM	#9
busterb NSABFD Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: MS. usa Posts: 3,908	In my rabbit assed mind, I wonder, does Radar really believe, or is he just yanking folks chain? His last post about all for the money kinda sucks to us VETS. __________________ I've haven't left very deep footprints in the sands of time. But, boy I've left a bunch.

01-01-2008, 07:06 PM	#11
Radar Constitutional Scholar Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Ocala, FL Posts: 4,006	How cute. The pathetic moron who supports violating the Constitution and who lives in his own dream world where Congress has powers prohibited to it by the Constitution, calls me a punk. LOL!!! Your service means nothing if you claim the federal government has any authority over immigration after being spoonfed the FACT that the Constitution prohibits it. I served with honor and distinction and left with my honorable discharge to do more challenging things while continuing to uphold my oath to defend the Constitution from foreign and domestic enemies of the Constitution...like you. __________________ "I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death." - George Carlin

01-01-2008, 07:01 PM	#14
classicman barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy. Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 23,401	Radar, that image you posted implies that a woman who speaks her mind should be beaten. YOU are an asshole. __________________ "like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt

01-01-2008, 07:04 PM	#15
TheMercenary “Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo” Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Savannah, Georgia Posts: 21,393	You know who else earns more than a general!?!?!? Whores, drug dealers, shister religious leaders, and John Edwards. __________________ Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)