12-15-2006, 01:14 PM | #136 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What is ID but politics.
No science gets into textbooks by political voting... why would the ID people not want theirs to go through the same scientific rigors and path as any other hypothesis to get to textbooks as any other theory? |
12-15-2006, 08:53 PM | #137 |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Many have little idea how widespread are scams and misinformation. You can buy devices to discharge the sky so that lightning will not strike (Early Streamer Emission (ESE) lightning rods). Some will even add radioactive materials that somehow make them better. Or Geritol for reduced aging. Pond's Institute for younger lasting skin. Power strip protectors so hyped in Circuit City. Atkin's diet. Head On. Listerine. In each case, they don't even try to make claims based in science and logic. Somehow observation or feelings alone is proof enough.
Add to that list Intelligent Design. They don't even try to meet the well proven benchmark that make science successful and productive. Somehow we are just suppost to know - and that is sufficient. Above is a list of items to benchmark yourself. Do you demand based upon principles taught in school science? Or do you just know? Did I mention I know this Prince in Nigeria who needs your help. |
12-15-2006, 10:08 PM | #138 | |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Quote:
|
|
12-16-2006, 01:00 AM | #139 |
Bioengineer and aspiring lawer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 872
|
Right, you can't just drop science and logic once you leave the classroom, it has to apply to every decision that gets made. Every decision, most people get stuck on that.
__________________
The most valuable renewable resource is stupidity. |
12-24-2006, 03:03 AM | #140 | ||||
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course. |
||||
12-31-2006, 10:42 AM | #141 |
snowman
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2
|
Here's some REAL perverting of science in the name of fundamentalist BS:
Grand Canyon National Park is not permitted to give an official estimate of the geologic age of its principal feature, due to pressure from Bush administration appointees. Despite promising a prompt review of its approval for a book claiming the Grand Canyon was created by Noah's flood rather than by geologic forces, more than three years later no review has ever been done and the book remains on sale at the park, according to documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). "In order to avoid offending religious fundamentalists, our National Park Service is under orders to suspend its belief in geology," stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch. "It is disconcerting that the official position of a national park as to the geologic age of the Grand Canyon is ‘no comment.'" |
12-31-2006, 10:45 AM | #142 |
Franklin Pierce
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
|
*chokes on food*
That is a joke right? Please please please be a joke. |
12-31-2006, 11:11 AM | #143 |
Flocci Non Facio
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In The Line Of Fire
Posts: 571
|
For me Al Bore´s "An Inconvenient Truth" is the Mother of Perverting Science for Politics.
How does it feel to have a stalker, tw?
__________________
Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. Last edited by Hippikos; 12-31-2006 at 11:15 AM. |
12-31-2006, 03:37 PM | #144 |
Violator of Customs
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 49
|
Bush sucks. Remember this the next time you think about voting republican.
|
12-31-2006, 11:07 PM | #145 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
|
Any geology book, textbook or popular read, will tell you the Canyon itself is five million years old or a little less, and will tell you the age of the Vishnu Schist of the lower Canyon.
There might be such a thing as a young -- comparatively young -- schist. Somebody'd have to tell me about it, though... Suncrafter, toe-tag Democrats may come by it honestly -- a very elderly New Deal Democrat is a friend of mine -- but they are the opposite of smart. The current crop of national-level Democrats aren't worth a vote nor a dime. They think like Socialists, and they are in too much of a hurry to find a substitute, any substitute, for victory in the War On Terror, which they believe in far less than the terrorists who actually killed some of us. Expect the Dems to behave in one of two ways, and these only: stupid, or treasonous. Since I am neither, I suggest you join me in voting against the Dem candidates, and funding the campaigns of their opponents. The Republic is more important than any party.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course. Last edited by Urbane Guerrilla; 12-31-2006 at 11:13 PM. |
01-01-2007, 03:23 AM | #146 | |
Franklin Pierce
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
|
Quote:
We can argue about what party is worse all day long and all you will get is both parties doing the exact same thing but with a slightly different twist. Both parties are power whores that will abuse their power the instant they get it, helping only a select few instead of the majority. |
|
01-01-2007, 01:39 PM | #147 | |
King Of Wishful Thinking
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 6,669
|
Quote:
I also believe that the Republic rests upon the Constitution, and that the rush to achieve perfect safety by weakening that framework is a greater threat to the Republic than any terrorist weapon. I do not agree with men who disparage individuals who disagree with the adminsitration, people who claim that those who refuse to meekly submit to authoritarian demands to abolish or bypass Constitutional guarantees to freedom are the enemies of freedom. Unlike UG, I will not ask for anyone to join me in opposing all Republicans, just those who abdicate their roles in acting to require that the adminstration seek real advice and consent from Congress. For a man who declares his love of a Republic, UG acts more like a serf in a fiefdom, looking to his lord to protect and command him. For a country that prides itself on it's 'citizen soldiers', how did we end up with someone like him?
__________________
Exercise your rights and remember your obligations - VOTE!I have always believed that hope is that stubborn thing inside us that insists, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us so long as we have the courage to keep reaching, to keep working, to keep fighting. -- Barack Hussein Obama Last edited by richlevy; 01-01-2007 at 01:45 PM. |
|
01-02-2007, 02:49 AM | #148 | |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
|
My, Rich, speaking of alleged thought...
But I've compared your thinking to Mario Cuomo's before -- how does a guy clearly that bright stay so often wrong? And just where is "serfdom" in rejecting the thrust of a given party's policy habits anyway? It's the Democratic Party's record that has me disenchanted with them. Intellectually, their socialism is all shoddy goods, unworthy of an intelligent electorate, and relying for its success on an electorate that isn't so intelligent. The Dem Party has not been selling anything I wanted to buy since 1992 and before. My coming to Libertarianism from reading Murry Rothbard in 1983 has made me particularly resistant to the Dem Party's socialistic trend. Then there's this party's inability at foreign policy: none of the present lot could win a war, though some few of them could probably start a war. But having started a war, then they flag, and as Ann Coulter remarks, declare that the war, whichever and any, is "unwinnable." Recall how utterly clueless the Clinton Administration was in its use of the military -- sporadic, half thought out activity, pursued halfheartedly, withdrawn muddledly. The last Democratic President to win a war was Truman. All since have uniformly dropped the ball. That's a long time to stay this incapable. Was Coulter right -- does the Democratic Party have a tropism towards treason? Or is this mere incompetence -- or would that be better evidenced by at least half of their decisions redounding in the national favor? John Kerry voted against the Contras, and thus for the good of the Communists -- and that one vote was no anomaly in the man's professional life. If you want the nation to win, nowadays the choice is a Republican, until such time as we have enough Libertarians who think like I do. This is because a major power's political schools of thought have to be able to exert force when necessary, and have the intellectual and spiritual robustness to see it through. If any should lack this, they lack any prospect of attaining any position of power or influence. I doubt that any Republicans abdicated any role whatsoever -- for they understood and I hope still understand that there's a mess out there to clean up. The Dems have adopted a posture of abdicating any responsibility to act in the Republic's interest vis-a-vis the anti-democrats that are our foes. Quote:
Now how about you, Rich? Did you commit so far -- or did you have "other priorities?"
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course. |
|
01-06-2007, 10:30 PM | #149 | ||
King Of Wishful Thinking
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 6,669
|
Quote:
Even people who never get the chance can still support the Constitution by simply exercising their rights. The Democratic wave in Congress, and the Republican wave that preceded it were examples of the people doing just that. Being in the military does not give one special insight into the purpose and care of the Constitution. It also does not disqualify one from doing so. The founding fathers, in fact, created the 2nd amendment partially as a response to the creation of a federal standing army. Maybe they thought that it might be a good idea if local militias stood ready in case a group of guys like UG started organizing within the Army. Quote:
As for Clinton, he did pull troops out of Somalia, but he also managed to help successfully prosecute a war in Bosnia with real international support that didn't cost us 300 billion dollars and 3000 lives.
__________________
Exercise your rights and remember your obligations - VOTE!I have always believed that hope is that stubborn thing inside us that insists, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us so long as we have the courage to keep reaching, to keep working, to keep fighting. -- Barack Hussein Obama |
||
01-07-2007, 08:26 PM | #150 | |||
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Even Quantum physics (the source of Gb disk drives and new computer memories) is being quashed by the mental midget and his Republican dominated congress. No reason for things to change. From the NY Times of 8 Jan 2007:
Quote:
Quote:
When I was growing up, transistors were the promise of the future. Today, quantum physics is that same future promise. Quote:
|
|||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|