10-18-2013, 10:13 AM | #136 |
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
|
Clod,
I asked a question...I wasn't makin' a point by way of the question. I didn't bring myself into the question, you did. And: no, I resent nuthin' cause I ain't payin' nuthin. Now... As I understand it: the point of the fine is to cover those expenses one may incur if using medical resources without insurance. Leaving aside that one may be able to pay his or her own way without resorting to insurance (out of pocket), at least for the first year might it be the better deal to just pay the fine? It's just (a line of) questions, folks...I'm curious how people are doing all of this (what choices they're makin'), is all. Last edited by henry quirk; 10-18-2013 at 10:47 AM. |
10-18-2013, 01:59 PM | #137 | |
We have to go back, Kate!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
|
I'd imagine that would work, if you only encountered run of the mill health problems. Antibiotics, inhalors, maybe even a bone reset after a break. But if you end up in a hospital bed for a few nights, or you have a sudden and unexpected need for chemotherapy and the like, I expect it would get cripplingly expensive quite fast.
It'd be a gamble. But then I guess that's the point of an insurance system in the first place. The insurance companies gamble that you will never need more treatment than would fall under the copay limit. And you gamble that you might just need a hospital stay at some point. So, as long as you don't get seriously ill or have an accident requiring a complex medical response, it might well be more cost effective to pay the fine and be uninsured.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
10-18-2013, 02:47 PM | #138 |
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
|
"as long as you don't get seriously ill or have an accident requiring a complex medical response, it might well be more cost effective to pay the fine and be uninsured"
I must have gotten sumthin' wrong in my readings 'cause I assumed the fine (which goes up to astronomical levels down the road) would cover you no matter the nature of a medical treatment (no matter how costly). Again: isn't the point of the fine to cover those expenses one may incur if using medical resources without insurance? If not: then what's the fine for? |
10-18-2013, 02:58 PM | #139 |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
It's for not following the law, liker most fines are.
The only way it "covers" you is by adding to the governments coffers, from which it pays the subsidies for poor people buying insurance. Those people having insurance makes it easier for the hospital to manage the people who get emergency care, and can't pay. So, if you decide to pay the fine instead of getting coverage, you'll be in the same boat as you are now if you have no insurance, but a bit of the pressure is taken off of the hospitals.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
10-18-2013, 03:00 PM | #140 |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
The fine is a stick to get you to join the program. It doesn't grant you access to anything.
|
10-18-2013, 03:02 PM | #141 | ||
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Quote:
Quote:
It's true that if you do have the means to pay out-of-pocket, you will probably save money by simply paying the fine. But very few people really have those means. They think they do, but they don't truly understand how quickly medical bills can add up. My dad is a soft libertarian who has been playing that gamble his entire life. He has excellent self-discipline, and does indeed live well below his means so that he can keep savings in the five digits earmarked for self-pay medical costs. He did even have to pay out once in a major way when he had an unexpected heart clot and spent a day in the hospital. But he never spent time in an ICU, never got cancer. Had that happened, his 5-digit savings would have been laughable, and he would have been fucked. He shrugs and says, "Well, that's life," and asserts that if he's that bad off he'd be okay with just dying. But my experience is that when face-to-face with death, most people find (too late) that they'd rather stay alive after all. |
||
10-18-2013, 03:06 PM | #142 |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
I'd actually be a fan of the "fine" subscribing you to medicare, and charging you the cost.
IE, single payer.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
10-18-2013, 03:17 PM | #143 |
maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,162
|
Okay: I got it now.
Thanks. I'll have more questions (as they come to mind). |
10-24-2013, 04:34 PM | #144 | |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Even the Democrats are upset about the Obamacare website.
But does that stop them from being mistaken when it's time to shift the blame ? http://www.politico.com/story/2013/1...815_Page2.html Politico 10/24/13 Obamacare website hearing takeaways: Missing word was ‘sorry’ Quote:
How long have these websites been up and running, but yet: . (from here) |
|
10-29-2013, 10:38 AM | #145 |
Goon Squad Leader
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
|
Have you met Chance?
The Affordable Care Act is a big deal, both in it's significance to our society and government as well as a big deal in terms of it's scope. Much has been made of the crucial impact young healthy people will have on the financial aspect of the law. Of course, we all have a financial aspect to our lives, and many people make choices with the costs in mind. The immediate costs of the premiums are easy to quantify, easy to see; you pay them right away. The longer term costs of care for an illness or an injury are much harder to quantify because they're not known with nearly as much certainty. Injured? Sick? Me?? Pfffft... no way man.
But. All of us can imagine, can imagine an accident and these brilliant commercials help us envision circumstances when we take a chance, and what the consequences *might be*. Just brilliant!
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not. |
10-29-2013, 10:58 AM | #146 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
They do get your attention !
|
10-29-2013, 08:32 PM | #147 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
Meanwhile in Vermont:Vermont is designing nation’s first universal health-care system
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
11-07-2013, 11:48 PM | #148 | ||
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
||
11-07-2013, 11:57 PM | #149 |
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
What is looking to become the big issue is that, by far, the vast majority of those who are signing up are old and/or unhealthy. All those young healthy people needed to make this magically somehow work so that millions more get insurance while not driving up the costs (remember that?) are apparently not doing so. If thats the case come March, then the costs are going to skyrocket. Apparently all of this was known and it was a gamble.
We'll see how this works out. By next March we'll have a far better indication of what will happen in 2015. As for the 6% who are like me and are self-employed. We're such a small group that we weren't really factored into the equation. No one cares about us ... Oh wait 6% of the US is about 15 MILLION people. Thats a pretty damn significant group. Many are getting the letters like I did. Just chalk us up as the unintended consequences. Additionally, keep in mind that the exemption for employers will expire as well. Once that happens companies will have to determine if they can/want to continue offering coverage as an added benefit to its employees. *IF* all those young people DON'T sign up and the rates for 2015 are astronomical, then LOOK OUT! Many companies will not be able to afford the added cost.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
11-08-2013, 01:55 AM | #150 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
|
I must not Obama.
ObamaCare is the job-killer. . . . When the Obama is past, I will turn my mind's eye to see its path, where there will be nothing. Only I will remain.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|