The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2010, 09:34 AM   #1
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Nothing in the Demoncratic Healthcare Reform Bills would protect anyone from these kinds of increases. That is the point I have been bringing up for months. This increase is how the insurance companies will recoup any cost increases they incur with the proposed plans. The fact that they are unregulated is not addressed in the proposed plans; the fact that they are in an uncompetitive market is not addressed in the proposed plans, although I do recall the Republickins introducing a proposal for there to be greater competition in a free market across state lines. Nothing in the proposed plans on the table would prevent an insurance company from doing this in the future.
And I have said repeatedly that you should actually read the text of the legislation (that I cited on numerous occasions) and not just opposition talking points and you would find that your assertions are in fact, incorrect.

And what the Republican proposal would have allowed is for the insurance companies to shop around for the least regulated state, including American Samoa, and apply those lowest standards across the board for consumers in any state in which the company has nexus.

But at this point, it really doesnt matter.

Have a healthy and truthful day!

Last edited by Redux; 02-16-2010 at 09:46 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 10:53 AM   #2
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redux View Post
And I have said repeatedly that you should actually read the text of the legislation (that I cited on numerous occasions) and not just opposition talking points and you would find that your assertions are in fact, incorrect.
No my friend I have read it and there is nothing there to prevent it as I have stated numerous times over the last 6 months.
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 02:37 PM   #3
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
silly.
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 09:34 PM   #4
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Unless you're the one dying.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 09:50 PM   #5
SamIam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Not here
Posts: 2,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
silly.
Oh? A study done by Harvard last fall showed that 45,000 Americans die every year due to lack of health insurance. Doesn't seem very silly to me.
SamIam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 10:11 PM   #6
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
How many people die each year from smoking or alcohol or drugs? I'm not bitching, just curious what the numbers are in relation.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 10:23 PM   #7
SamIam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Not here
Posts: 2,655
I don't see what that has to do with the discussion at hand. Alcoholics with insurance will go to treatment facilities and have a better chance of recovery than the ones in the park passing the paper bag. The morality so called of a disease should have nothing to do with its treatment.
SamIam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 10:40 PM   #8
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
I said I was just curious - What does the number of people killed by terrorists have to do with heathcare?
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 07:08 AM   #9
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
I said I was just curious - What does the number of people killed by terrorists have to do with heathcare?
Which one is the more significant threat to American health and welfare based on hype vs. reality?
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 09:55 AM   #10
Spexxvet
Makes some feel uncomfortable
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
I said I was just curious - What does the number of people killed by terrorists have to do with heathcare?
We're outraged by one and not the other.
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce
Spexxvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 11:32 AM   #11
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Redux - just a thought here -
Why cannot we merge a system of regulation by the Feds with the state option. Won't the fed regulations on what they can charge... cover the insureds?
I'm really just sick of this at this point.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 11:52 AM   #12
Spexxvet
Makes some feel uncomfortable
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
How 'bout starting with a simple "hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, and health insurance companies will be not-for-profit"
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce
Spexxvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 11:54 AM   #13
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
Redux - just a thought here -
Why cannot we merge a system of regulation by the Feds with the state option. Won't the fed regulations on what they can charge... cover the insureds?
I'm really just sick of this at this point.
That is pretty much with the Senate did in its version

State-administered Exchanges with states having the option to opt out..and with federal statutory standards for coverage option with limits co-pays andout-of-pocket cost and required certification and approval of premium increases...the details of which would be in the regulations.

Subtitle D
PART I—Establishment of Qualified Health Plans

PART II—Consumer Choices and Insurance Competition....


But, by now, I'm tired or repeating myself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 12:29 PM   #14
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Subtitle D deals with drug plans.

Subtitle D – Medicare Part D Improvements for Prescription Drug Plans and MA–PD Plans
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 12:35 PM   #15
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Subtitle D deals with drug plans.

Subtitle D – Medicare Part D Improvements for Prescription Drug Plans and MA–PD Plans
It would probably help if you looked at the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as passed by the Senate:

Title I - Subtitle D - Parts I (establisment of qualified plans) , Part II (consumer choice and insurance competition), Part III and IV (state flexibility)
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.