01-18-2007, 01:19 AM | #16 |
Kinda n00b Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 27
|
So, to immediately put my foot in my mouth: China: Kingdom of bicycles no more
Be worried. If you have given even a moment's thought to climate warming and its potential impact on our planet, be very worried. China, a nation of 1.3 billion people, has abandoned the bicycle as a principal mode of transportation and is now moving at a frightening pace to a car-based economy.
__________________
'The Universe tends to unfold itself as it should' |
01-18-2007, 11:32 AM | #17 |
Franklin Pierce
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
|
Do you blame them?
When we start riding bicycles to work then we can complain about them not using bikes to get to work. |
01-18-2007, 01:11 PM | #18 |
lobber of scimitars
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phila Burbs
Posts: 20,774
|
We can complain anyway. That's one of the benefits of that Bill of Rights thingy that we have and everybody else doesn't.
__________________
wolf eht htiw og "Conspiracies are the norm, not the exception." --G. Edward Griffin The Creature from Jekyll Island High Priestess of the Church of the Whale Penis |
01-18-2007, 01:39 PM | #19 |
Hoodoo Guru
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 304
|
why doesnt it get used? what can it achieve if it were to be used?
__________________
Atheist n A person to be pitied in that he is unable to believe things for which there is no evidence, and who has thus deprived himself of a convenient means of feeling superior to others. |
01-18-2007, 02:22 PM | #20 |
Kinda n00b Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 27
|
It wasn't a complaint, it was just the exact opposite of what I said before. I was using China as an example of a country that doesn't have too bad of a dependency on oil, but it looks like times are a changing.
__________________
'The Universe tends to unfold itself as it should' |
01-18-2007, 04:30 PM | #21 |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
I don't really get it. Why would China do this? In the US, we were settled after the invention of the car, so we built everything far apart because we could. Now we need cars because nothing is close to anything else.
In China, they have been doing just fine with bicycles. I assume things are close together if bikes work OK. Why switch to cars if it ain't broke? |
01-18-2007, 04:40 PM | #22 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes, China and India are very naughty... does not matter, we need to do what we need to do, period.
Doing what is right has nothing to do with what others are doing. In fact, it gives one a stronger platform from which to argue your point. |
01-18-2007, 04:58 PM | #23 |
-◊|≡·∙■·∙≡|◊-
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Parts unknown.
Posts: 4,081
|
It has everything to do with what others are doing. If our costs increase (as a result of stricter enforcement/higher standards) and their's don't then demand for our goods and services decline and jobs disappear, wages drop, etc.
I'm glad we aren't signing that stupid treaty - it hamstrings the US and lets China and India do whatever the hell they want. How many jobs are you willing to sacrifice over this?
__________________
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ |
01-18-2007, 05:10 PM | #24 |
Banned - Self Imposed
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
|
well put!
|
01-18-2007, 07:04 PM | #25 |
Kinda n00b Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 27
|
Beestie: I don't understand your connection between the Kyoto treaty and lost jobs. Not that you're right or wrong, I'm just in the dark.
I think the number of jobs or the economic backlash shouldn't be as important as the overall death of the planet. If we wait till no one loses something from the changes, then it will be far too late- if it isn't already. I think the whole world culture needs to agree to a very proactive change in the way we treat the planet. Like the Kyoto Treaty as a start
__________________
'The Universe tends to unfold itself as it should' |
01-18-2007, 08:05 PM | #26 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
Planetary death is hyperbole. Should we move past fossil fuels? Of course. Fossil fuels are old dirty tech, we can do better. The problem is the way way we move forward. Lots of our environmental friends look back at pre-industrial society as a model. Starvation, no communication, closed societies, human bondage, you know, the good old days. We John Waynists prefer to improve our way out of problems.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
01-18-2007, 08:08 PM | #27 | |
Franklin Pierce
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
|
Quote:
|
|
01-18-2007, 09:32 PM | #28 | ||
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Quote:
Sure levittown and commuting came along after the car but that was a chicken/egg deal. Quote:
Most of China has extremes in weather, from bitter snowy winter to monsoons and tropical downpours. How much fun is that on a bike? They didn't travel far because there was nothing to travel to, no malls, no Disney World, no resorts for the peasants. Roads are shit, too. They just started their road overhaul to connect every town and city with decent roads for the first time in history. You may see their lifestyle as quaint and bucolic, but I'm sure they're damn sick of it. How ya gonna keep 'em down on the farm....?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
||
01-18-2007, 09:44 PM | #29 | |
-◊|≡·∙■·∙≡|◊-
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Parts unknown.
Posts: 4,081
|
Quote:
Those freeways unintentionally led to the creation and growth of suburbia and the massive sprawl we see today.
__________________
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ |
|
01-18-2007, 10:09 PM | #30 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
OK, but if we hadn't spread out, where would we put 300 million people?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|