Bush vs Clinton in 2008?

AlternateGray · 07-01-2006, 03:42 PM

I really think sending another Bush into national politics two years from now would be the last thing the Republicans want, due to the name alone. It would be like naming a ship "Titanic II" in 1913. Sure, it might be a decent ship, but...

The whup-ass ticket? Clinton and McCain split from their parties, go independent, and run together. Both have bipartisan characteristics, and between them they have a wide demographic appeal. They both have solid reputations, so the "independent= whacko" stigma is mitigated... I'd say Powell/Hillary, but the black guy/female ticket would be too much for the fragile; maybe McCain/Powell.

07-01-2006, 03:42 PM	#39
AlternateGray red-shirt guy Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Colorado Posts: 101	I really think sending another Bush into national politics two years from now would be the last thing the Republicans want, due to the name alone. It would be like naming a ship "Titanic II" in 1913. Sure, it might be a decent ship, but... The whup-ass ticket? Clinton and McCain split from their parties, go independent, and run together. Both have bipartisan characteristics, and between them they have a wide demographic appeal. They both have solid reputations, so the "independent= whacko" stigma is mitigated... I'd say Powell/Hillary, but the black guy/female ticket would be too much for the fragile; maybe McCain/Powell. __________________ If it wasn't for hypergraphia, I wouldn't have put anything here at all.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)