![]() |
|
Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Quote:
I don't necessarily have a problem with the idea that everyone should pay something, but that's not mutually exclusive to the idea of a progressive taxation scale either. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
I can't support the notion of progressive taxation. It would be smarter to flatten it out and remove the deductions that most really rich people get to takes. What ever "rich" is....
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Esnohplad Semaj Ton
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: A little south of sanity
Posts: 2,259
|
With a system sufficiently simple we could get rid of the IRS, and outsource to commercial collections agencies.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Good idea, then the trashman could break some fingers and kneecaps on his regular route. The trashman knows your standard of living better than most. Save fuel, very efficient, green solution.
![]()
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|