The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Health

Health Keeping your body well enough to support your head

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2010, 11:17 AM   #31
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by monster View Post

Srsly, i don't have a problem with it. If a doctor will sign off on it as a health benefit, it should be included. Of course there will be crooked doctors who will help people screw the system.
Even if every doctor signed off on every pump, it wouldn't amount to jack shit for the government's coffers, whereas it could be a significant help for the pumper.
But more than that, it would be the right thing for the IRS to do.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 11:23 AM   #32
Pete Zicato
Turns out my CRS is a symptom of TMB.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pico and ME View Post
Maybe if you had been breastfed, you wouldn't have Crohn's now.

j/k

(sort of)
It's possible. Statistics show that industrialized nations have a much higher incidence of Crohn's. But they don't know why that is.

On the other hand, this was the 50s and my mother smoked through the pregnancy and after. I don't know what the relative merits of breast feeding would be in that case.
__________________


Talk nerdy to me.
Pete Zicato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 11:27 AM   #33
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
It would give her a chance to sit and have a cigarette.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 11:29 AM   #34
Pico and ME
Are you knock-kneed?
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Middle Hoosierland
Posts: 3,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Zicato View Post
It's possible. Statistics show that industrialized nations have a much higher incidence of Crohn's. But they don't know why that is.

On the other hand, this was the 50s and my mother smoked through the pregnancy and after. I don't know what the relative merits of breast feeding would be in that case.
Yeah, my Mom smoked too. Thats probably why we are all so short....
Pico and ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 11:40 AM   #35
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Zicato View Post
It's possible. Statistics show that industrialized nations have a much higher incidence of Crohn's. But they don't know why that is.
I actually wouldn't be surprised if industrialized nations actually had higher breastfeeding rates, thanks to the immorality of the formula industry and the relative advertising naïveté of the third world.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 11:45 AM   #36
monster
I hear them call the tide
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perpetual Chaos
Posts: 30,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
It would give her a chance to sit and have a cigarette.
__________________
The most difficult thing is the decision to act, the rest is merely tenacity Amelia Earhart
monster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 11:56 AM   #37
jinx
Come on, cat.
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
Even the sickest babies benefit from breast-feeding


Quote:
"Human milk is important for all newborns, but especially for sick infants," said project mentor Diane L. Spatz, Ph.D., R.N.-B.C., nurse researcher, of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Breast milk protects an infant in the NICU from necrotizing enterocolitis—a devastating disease of the bowel—and from a host of infectious diseases. "It is of critical importance that all mothers make the informed decision to provide human milk for their infants, and that nurses provide evidence-based lactation care and support in order for mothers to achieve success," added Spatz.
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good.
jinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 03:26 PM   #38
skysidhe
~~Life is either a daring adventure or nothing.~~
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,828
I had so much milk I should have hired myself out as a wet nurse.

wtf @ the IRS
skysidhe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 04:47 PM   #39
BigV
Goon Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Zicato View Post
It's possible. Statistics show that industrialized nations have a much higher incidence of Crohn's. But they don't know why that is.

On the other hand, this was the 50s and my mother smoked through the pregnancy and after. I don't know what the relative merits of breast feeding would be in that case.
Never too late to start. You're only as young as you feel!
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
BigV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2010, 09:24 AM   #40
Spexxvet
Makes some feel uncomfortable
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnee123 View Post
[begin sarcastical part] Hey, a guy needs to get his rocks off. It's healthier for society, so they don't go on rampages and stuff (you don't believe that, do you guys? That you're such animals? Yeah, i don't either.)
Hey! My best friend died on 911 from DSB (deadly semen backup)
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce
Spexxvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2010, 10:18 AM   #41
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey View Post
I actually wouldn't be surprised if industrialized nations actually had higher breastfeeding rates, thanks to the immorality of the formula industry and the relative advertising naïveté of the third world.
I'd think that would be a very recent reversal then. The whole babyfood industry began life in the industrialised world. They had a huge impact on parenting patterns in Britain, Europe and America. I remember my mum telling me that when she was growing up, powdered babymilk was seen as a healthier option: it was 'scientifically' balanced :P

There's a massive legacy from that. Rates of breastfeeding in inner-city areas are often shockingly low. The area I represent in council, is mainly white working-class and suffers from all the problems of a deprived area with high unemployment. Breastfeeding rates there are slowly coming up, but only because the local health trust and the council have been working together to promote it and outreach new young mums.

Think about what we give out little girls to play with: baby dolls, with little milkbottles. And think about how long we have been doing that as a society. Breastfeeding has always been culturally problematic. Wealthy medieval ladies gave their babies to a paid wetnurse to suckle. It was seen as entirely inappropriate for them to feed their children themselves.

The craze for the 'natural' in the 18th century made it terribly fashionable for a while for ladies to breastfeed.

During the 19th and 20th centuries the 'scientific' approach took over, first off giving us the scientifically sanctioned need to breastfeed; then by giving us the scientically sanctioned need to feed them a more balanced diet than women's bodies could provide, then finally to a scientific imperative to breastfeed.

Unfortunately the weight of years against breastfeeding in recent history still outweighs the that for it: even if the science is stronger.

Truth is 'breasts' have always been cultural and political signifiers. From the taxonomical studies of breastsize conducted during the 18th century voyages of Captain Cook and his ilk, in which the size and shape of women's breasts were employed as a measure of a race's evolutionary stage; to the legal ban on showing them in public; and to the moral outrage applied by society to each successive generation of women because they were or because they were not breastfeeding.

Few things in a society's development are as politicised as what makes a 'mother' and what makes a 'father'. Breastfeeding is one of those central issues of motherhood. Revolutionary ideology, conservative rhetoric, feminist perspectives, paternalistic proscriptions: all have at various historical juncures been mapped onto the woman's maternal role and in particuar the feeding of her child. From the 18th Century 'Mothers of the Nation' to depictions of nations through a female figure; with cartoonists and polemicists employing the image of the nursing mother to comment on everything from internal political strife, to international relations.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/

Last edited by DanaC; 10-30-2010 at 10:30 AM.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2010, 10:36 AM   #42
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
@ Dana
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestl%C3%A9_boycott

http://multinationalmonitor.org/hype...4/formula.html

http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/formula.htm

http://www.babymilkaction.org/CEM/compseptoct01.html

http://www.babymilkaction.org/CEM/compseptoct01.html
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2010, 11:37 AM   #43
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
I'm not doubting the manufacturers' campaigns nor the effect on those countries. I'm saying that the situation in the west isn't as rosy as all that.

Figures for Britain from 2005 show that:
Quote:
Overall, only 35 per cent of UK babies are being exclusively breastfed at one week, 21 per cent at six weeks, 7 per cent at four months and 3 per cent at five months.
http://www.babyfriendly.org.uk/page.asp?page=21


For Congo the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in the same year were 24% for the first 4 months, and 19% up to 6 months

For Ethiopia the figures were 57% for first 4 months and 49% up to six months.


The cultural reach that artificial food has in those countries is huge: but the cultural reach it had over here up until the 70s was vast. They are dealing with a recent development: we are still affected by earlier developments, even though attitudes have changed.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2010, 12:28 PM   #44
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
One of the best little books I've read is Nine Hills to Nambonkaha: Two Years in the Heart of an African Village ,
about a Peace Core volunteer who went to a village way off the nearest road with only a notebook and a simple scale.

Her job was to weigh babies and assist mothers in breastfeeding because the ground water was so contaminated
that mixing the baby formula distributed by NGO's was causing illness and deaths.

It's an inspiring account of what a young woman can do all by herself.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2010, 07:26 PM   #45
spudcon
Beware of potatoes
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Upstate NY, USA
Posts: 2,078
No matter what the IRS or formula companies say, breastfeeding has been successful for millenia, or we wouldn't be here now. The incidence of heart disease and high cholestrol would be drastically reduced if all human babies were raised on human mother's milk. It is high in cholestrol, and the babies bodies develop a means of using it and controling it. Feeding kids homoginized cows milk is not good.
__________________
"I believe that being despised by the despicable is as good as being admired by the admirable."
spudcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.