![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 | |
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
Quote:
This may all be posturing, but it is certainly headed in the wrong direction.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
erika
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
|
The biggest problem with the North Korea situation is that the North can literally level the entire city of Seoul within 20-30 minutes. They have THAT MUCH artillery pointed at it - and that ISN'T counting the missiles. If Kim decides he's in danger, or wants to start a war (with the Sultanistic government structure, it's really ALL about what Kim says), Seoul is just GONE. North Korea would get it's ass kicked - China wouldn't come to their support, I think, if they could absolutely say Kim started it. China would definitely try to retain its political power on the peninsula, but would be unlikely to send combat troops to fight the U.S. and South Korea if Kim were to unilaterally attack. So basically what it comes down to is, if Kim is REALLY trying to start something here, we can't make the first military move, or China will get involved - but if China can be persuaded or convinced to withdraw its support of the North, in exchange for continued political power in the area, Kim would really be out of luck - at the cost of, basically, the entire population of Seoul.
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
erika
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
|
Without China retaliating? No. That is exactly how NOT to avoid WWIII over this.
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Makes some feel uncomfortable
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
|
I think you'd change your mind if your Momma was living there.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |||
Franklin Pierce
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,695
|
Quote:
The second theory I've heard is that a rouge group of soldiers decided to escalate the conflict and attacked SK on their own. Kim obviously could not allow people to think he doesn't have complete control so he would never admit it. Unfortunately, we have very little intelligence about NK so we probably will not know for some time, if ever. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
I like my perspectives like I like my baseball caps: one size fits all. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
erika
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "the high up north"
Posts: 6,127
|
A nuclear or massive-scale-conventional assault on North Korea would definitely spark Chinese retaliation, to save face if nothing else. China would feel the need to ensure its interests on the peninsula are kept safe - any solution to the North Korea problem would require Chinese support.
Think of it as, North Korea is China's unruly little brother. China wouldn't necessarily mind someone helping them take care of the rowdy little bugger, as long as they didn't, you know, pound him into oblivion. Kim is embarrassing the Chinese government by throwing his tantrums, but they don't just want him - or, rather, their influence over the region - to just disappear. China is the biggest player in the region, and ANY solution to the NK problem would need their full support, and to ensure their influence and interests are upheld. ETA: also, would the U.S.'s interests in Japan or Taiwan or Canada be worth the cost of a war to defend them? Probably not, logically speaking, but treaties and a sense of duty to our friends mean that we would do so anyway. Likewise, China would come to North Korea's aid if they were not reassured that their interests would be looked out for. ETA 2: Besides, if you were China and detected an ICBM launch towards you, you'd probably shoot first and ask questions later, too.
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh Last edited by Ibby; 05-25-2010 at 03:25 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Makes some feel uncomfortable
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
|
You heartless bastard! I'm telling your mom what you said.
![]() Seriously, you'd really sacrifice your own mother just to start a war with NK?
__________________
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
BBC News reports a rather interesting observation. China is completely confused by this entire issue. Not that it has attracted so much attention - far more than China apparently expected. China apparently cannot figure out why N Korea did this. It sounds so much like what happened during the silly Spy Plane incident. Chinese leadership was the last to learn what had happened. Was completely blindsided by the turmoil and rumblings of war. But this is a different Chinese leadership. According to the BBC, Chinese are stalling for time until they can figure out what this is all about. This is part of a long process of China coming to grips with its responsibilities to the world. Normally China would avoid the entire issue because they see no profit in it. But the issue has been forced upon them. More reasons for their confusion. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Come on, cat.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
|
They better get used to it.
"How dare China police the world!!" "Why isn't China policing the world?!?" "How could they let this happen?" "When are they gonna fix it?!" Suckers.
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|