The Obamanation

[BDS]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

Should I add that to your list of insults?

Seriously, you need to start drinking or something.

You should probably drink less. Don't you know it limits reaction times?

[TheMercenary]

Obama will own your bank.

The Obama administration will call for increased oversight of executive pay at all banks..

The new rules will cover all financial institutions, including those not now covered by any pay rules because they are not receiving U.S. government bailout money. Officials say the rules could also be applied more broadly to publicly traded companies, which already report about some executive pay practices to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Last month, as part of the stimulus package, Congress barred top executives at large banks getting rescue money from receiving bonuses exceeding one-third of their annual pay.

Beyond the pay rules, officials said the regulatory plan is expected to call for a broad new role for the Federal Reserve to oversee large companies, including major hedge funds, whose problems could pose risks to the entire financial system.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/03/...22regulate.php

[sugarpop]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

Obama will own your bank.



http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/03/...22regulate.php

This only covers banks getting TARP funds, and only until they pay back the money. Why should that bother you? After that, they can go back to their old behavior. Which sucks. We NEED pay reform in this country.

[OnyxCougar]

Originally Posted by sugarpop

This only covers banks getting TARP funds, and only until they pay back the money. Why should that bother you? After that, they can go back to their old behavior. Which sucks. We NEED pay reform in this country.

Apparently, they can't repay the loans, pop.

source

Text:

As you know, I did not support the legislation creating the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Among the many reasons I could not support the legislation was the fact that, despite verbal assurances by your predecessor and others about the purposes for which the TARP program would be used, once monies were appropriated there were virtually no meaningful safeguards against them being used for – quite literally – any reason and in any manner whatsoever.

Sadly, almost immediately after Congress funded what amounted to a blank check, the TARP was put to other purposes than those used to sell the program. One such use was the ‘Capital Purchase Program,’ through which the federal government has become a stockholder in many financial institutions.

But we now know that the very largest institutions were summoned to Washington and essentially informed by Secretary Hank Paulson that the government was buying into their businesses through the Capital Purchase Program – whether they liked it or not. In fact, one of Mr. Paulson’s “talking points” for that meeting was that “if a capital infusion is not appealing, you should be aware your regulator will require it in any circumstance.” Other institutions were merely ‘urged’ by their regulators to participate in the Capital Purchase Program. Tony Soprano could not have been more direct.

Unfortunately, it now also seems that – as with Tony Soprano – getting Uncle Sam out of your business is much more difficult than letting him in. Now many healthy institutions (institutions that have just passed government “stress tests”) have concluded they no longer want the government as an investor in their businesses. They want to pay back the TARP funds and conduct their businesses without the aid or interference of government.

But, rather than hearing “hallelujah” from a federal agency eager at the prospect of recovering taxpayer money and winding down the TARP program, these institutions find themselves at the end of a growing list awaiting “permission” to repay the government! It gives the appearance that the Troubled Asset Relief Program – which was sold to the people as being one thing, but which has been conducted as another – might not be so eager to go out of business.

Reports that Treasury’s TARP office recently signed a 10 year lease on new office space in downtown Washington do not give comfort to those who question the motives of those running the ‘temporary’ TARP program. And I am sure that they do not give comfort to private sector institutions that do not understand why they need to get “permission” to give the taxpayers their money back.

Mr. Secretary, the federal government had no business making banks “an offer they couldn’t refuse” and muscling its way into their businesses by threatening regulatory retaliation. Now, when institutions want to return taxpayer money, their government should take it – and do so while refraining from any inference of reprisal.

The time has come for the federal government to exit the bailout business, and accepting returned Capital Purchase Program investments would be an excellent first step in that direction. Anything less is unacceptable.

Walter B. Jones, Jr.
(R), Representative of North Carolina.

[BDS]

Oh, and we're back to "lol obama."

Great.

[TGRR]

Originally Posted by BDS

Oh, and we're back to "lol obama."

Great.

I ALMOST ACCIDENTALLY THE WHOLE BANK.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by TGRR

I ALMOST ACCIDENTALLY THE WHOLE BANK.

forget about it

[BDS]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

forget about it

I will if you will.

[classicman]

well BDS - you've made quite a contribution since coming to the cellar. Welcome.

[BDS]

I try. And thanks.

[TheMercenary]

My ignore list grows.

[BDS]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

My ignore list grows.

Ah. So you're one of them then.


And Classicman, I did say I thought it did it automatically. :P

[TGRR]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

My ignore list grows.

Sorry. I didn't realize you were a pansy.

[classicman]

knock knock - your sarcasm meter broken?

[classicman]

Oh and by the way, Merc & BDS - If you don't set your usertitle, it changes with every post up to a certain number. So you were both wrong. See you DO have something in common. lol