The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-11-2009, 08:18 PM   #1
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
ok, then take them all out. Fuck it.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 09:04 PM   #2
TGRR
Horrible Bastard
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: High Desert, Arizona
Posts: 1,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
ok, then take them all out. Fuck it.

Wait. So you are only for tax cuts to the rich?
__________________
What can we do to help you stop screaming?
TGRR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 10:02 PM   #3
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
HA HA HA HA I knew I could count on you! where ya been all day?
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 10:12 PM   #4
TGRR
Horrible Bastard
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: High Desert, Arizona
Posts: 1,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
HA HA HA HA I knew I could count on you! where ya been all day?
Work. Apparently I don't get paid if I don't go.

TGRR,
That's the MAN trying to KEEP ME DOWN!
__________________
What can we do to help you stop screaming?
TGRR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 07:59 PM   #5
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Quote:
Barack Obama, US president, on Wednesday said he “did not begrudge” the multi-million dollar bonuses given out to Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs and Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase and added that their large pay-outs were a consequence of America’s “free market system”.

Mr Obama’s comments, in an interview with Bloomberg BusinessWeek, are likely to attract further controversy at a time when public anger over the Wall Street bonuses is increasingly being directed at Washington. They were also on Wednesday contrasted with Mr Obama’s recent criticisms of the “obscene” bonuses paid out on Wall Street as evidence that the White House was unable to sustain a clear message on the subject.
Link

Well which is it? After blasting these guys for so long, In March 2009 it was "Bonuses are violation of "our fundamental values" now suddenly its "That is part of the free-market system.” WTH? Which is it?
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt

Last edited by classicman; 02-10-2010 at 08:05 PM.
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 08:36 PM   #6
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
It's both. It's the way the free market system works, and an example of the more-for-me-fuck-you-and-the-country mentality of wall street.

What do you want him to do? If he bad mouths the system, then the republicans/tea baggers scream socialism. If he doesn't, they scream duplicity. Remember it's congress that has to fix this shit.
Attached Images
 
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 08:47 PM   #7
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
Remember it's congress that has to fix this shit.
Exactly. In fact I would be a much bigger supporter of Obama if the Congress wasn't so screwed up.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 08:46 PM   #8
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
Link

Well which is it? After blasting these guys for so long, In March 2009 it was "Bonuses are violation of "our fundamental values" now suddenly its "That is part of the free-market system.” WTH? Which is it?
That is because his admin is filled with GS lackey's. Why would he screw his own appointee's?
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 10:33 PM   #9
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
That is because his admin is filled with GS lackey's.
So why are those GS lackey's so viciously attacking GS's bonuses and other questionable activities. Oh. That is what GS wants its lackey's to do.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 10:25 PM   #10
Yznhymr
the crowd goes wild!
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 663
Obama can't spank his own monkey without bragging about it.
__________________
"The pride system tends to intensify the self-hate against which it is supposed to be a defense, since any failure to live up to one's tyrannical shoulds or of the world to honor one's claims leads to feelings of worthlessness." Bernard J. Paris, Ph.D.
Yznhymr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2015, 04:22 PM   #11
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
There is probably a better thread for this, but...

There have been many Dwellar complaints over the fact that no bank executives
have been held personally accountable for the financial crisis starting back in 2008.

The following article seems to me to hold out some hope, after all.

How to Punish Corporate Fraudsters
NY Times - ERIC R. HAVIANOCT. 22, 2015
Quote:
<snip>Few outside the legal community are familiar with the concept of “exclusion,”
which permits many federal agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission,
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Department of Health and Human Services
to temporarily or permanently block corporations that violate their rules from doing business with them.
Importantly, it can also be applied to individual corporate officers, such as chief executives
and lower-level executives, and is especially effective in the finance and health care industries.


Since most big banks are federally insured, and many large health care companies do business
with Medicare or Medicaid, barring an executive from that work can be a professional death sentence.

For example, the F.D.I.C. can bar someone for life from any federally insured bank
by demonstrating in an administrative hearing that the person violated federal banking regulations
or failed to correct any “unsafe or unsound practice.”

To exclude a health care executive from federal health programs,
the Department of Health and Human Services can also conduct an administrative hearing
to show that the executive engaged in fraud. And the S.E.C. can bar a financial services executive
by filing a civil case in federal court, showing that the person is unfit “to serve as an officer or director”
of a public company and proving that the executive knew about or recklessly ignored the improper activity.

Others have also been barred from any federally regulated bank over the past 15 years,
including the former C.E.O. of the now-defunct American Sterling Bank
and an executive of Louisiana’s First Guaranty Bank.
In addition, the Bear Stearns executives who were acquitted of criminal charges after the financial crisis
were later barred from the securities industry for several years.
<snip>
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 07:31 PM   #12
BigV
Goon Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
Yes, that does sound hopeful. But I am skeptical that the tool will be used.
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
BigV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2015, 08:55 PM   #13
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Well, it's probably too late for the 2008 economic crisis.

But for the serious fight that is coming on Medicare cost reductions,
it might carry some weight (after the fact), or even as a
preventative measure that would get the attention of CFO's, etc.

.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2015, 01:25 AM   #14
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
I'm pessimistic. For show they might throw a token or two who are ready to retire and have the golden parachute in their pocket, under the bus. But I'd be surprised at even that because it would affect the company's stock, and even if that was temporary stockholders would be ragging on their congress critters.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2015, 10:59 AM   #15
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Yup ... 7 YEARS later they are going to effectively blackball their financial friends and biggest political supporters ... Are you high?
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.