Jan 15th, 2017: Gravestone

[sexobon]

I'm not buying it. Other sources say she died February 1, 1876 and was buried February 4, 1876 and some volunteer paid for that marker to be placed at her grave in September 1997.

If the person who wrote the inscription couldn't get the woman's age and year of death right, which are in the historical records, what are the chances of the remainder of it being accurate.

(It's like someone is using a dead slut for attention whoring.)

[limey]

Originally Posted by sexobon

I'm not buying it. Other sources say she died February 1, 1876 and was buried February 4, 1876 and some volunteer paid for that marker to be placed at her grave in September 1997.

If the person who wrote the inscription couldn't get the woman's age and year of death right, which are in the historical records, what are the chances of the remainder of it being accurate.

(It's like someone is using a dead slut for attention whoring.)

I object to this - as recounted here (the only evidence we have), the girl was seduced. That does not make her a slut. It makes the seducer a bastard.
Thank you.

[Griff]

Thank you.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Originally Posted by sexobon

I'm not buying it. Other sources say she died [February 1, 1876 and was buried February 4, 1876 and some volunteer paid for that marker to be placed at her grave in September 1997.

You are correct about the niggling details, Mr Miyagi. Her name even might have been Simpson.

Fortunately, most people got the point that this has not been a rare story throughout history, and when we finally seemed to be a better society it looks like we may backslide terribly.