![]() |
|
|||||||
| Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
What the hell is an "intellectual safe" space? Isn't intellectual and safe diametrically opposed? I would think someone who is intellectual would be welcoming for examination any and all ideas, opinions, points of view.
Three cheers for Obama, he nailed it.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
Quote:
That's not to say that every person who was invited to speak, and then uninvited due to student protest falls into that category, but that category exists.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
But how do they know what the speaker will say until they say it? Track record? How do you know they haven't modified, or have more compelling evidence, for their position.
"Examined thoroughly and discarded" by whom, your teacher, your mentor, your friend, some "committee", or you? If it's not you, you're not receptive to outside ideas, and would seem to be a semi-intellectual. Even if you think they're a one trick pony, you might be surprised you can learn something from them. If you are sure of what they will say, any disagree with them, that's fine, but does that give you the right to deny others the opportunity to hear and make their own judgment? That's McCarthyism.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|