Illegal wire tapping of the FOX reporter

[Adak]

Citing sources won't matter. Extremists (right or left), have their agenda. Facts don't matter, if they don't support that agenda.

Do you know more about the legal process of obtaining a wire tap than a lawyer does? Do you know what it must contain?

Why wouldn't I listen to an attorney, like Mark Levin for instance? He was the AG's Chief of Staff years ago, and not only is (obviously), a talk show host now, and a lawyer, but also, has been involved with Landmark Legal since last March, on some of these cases now in the news.

Do you believe you know more about these cases than Mark Levin does?

Do you believe that a few hours of Googling will surpass his many years of working for the Justice Department, up to these high levels, and his long familiarity with these cases?

Of course not. It's odd that you somehow believe that you can.

If a reporter can't meet or communicate with his confidential sources, without being wire tapped and or put under surveillance , then very few confidential sources will come forward, since obviously they would be exposed.

Do you understand that fact, at least? Do you understand how completely that cuts out having a free press, and investigative reporting, of any subject that the current administration doesn't like?