The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-11-2012, 05:56 PM   #1
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
He put the dog crate on top of the car? Wtf was he thinking?

I think the biggest danger here is the man is clearly a fucking moron.*


*:p
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 11:04 AM   #2
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
He put the dog crate on top of the car? Wtf was he thinking?
And then posted was this reasoning. It was legal. Therefore it is OK.

So it is legal for Wall Street to subvert the nation's and world's economy. That is also OK?

Regulations need not exist for industries, persons, etc who are responsible. Heavy regulations are created after and because that industry or person is irresponsible. The reasoning: "it was legal and therefore acceptable". Therefore some, using that logic, loved the financial corruption of the 2000s and even Mission Accomplished. Legal was to hide costs ($billions) of Mission Accomplished outside of the federal budget. Yes it was good to not show those expenses in the budget. Therefore the people would not know its real costs. 'Legal' says that lie was also good and acceptable.

It was legal to put the dog on top of a speeding car? Being responsible is about lying - as long as no law exists to ban the lie? That was the reasoning. And not just Romney's. Others here are using the same reasoning.

We have a serious problem. Many assume that because something is legal, it is quite acceptable. Legal was to lie about Mission Accomplished. Legal was to deregulate financial corruption. Legal was to put a dog on top of the car. That proves all were good and acceptable.

A president was not impeached for massacring almost 5000 troops uselessly in Mission Accomplished. He was not impeached. That also proves it was a good thing? It was legal. Therefore it was good?
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.