![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#4 |
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
AT&T may well be whatever people think it is, I don't know.
But my issue here is really something completely different... By what service or product is this $39 BILLION merger benefiting the AT&T customers ? My answer is none. The merger was concocted to give AT&T a larger influence over the industry, "added spectrum" If AT&T does attempt to sell off a significant part of it's holdings, who will it sell to ? The only buyers being talked about are "investment" firms that foresee $ is to be made from transactions activity. These firms openly admit they have "no expertise" in the operations of this industry. IMO, AT&T represents many corporations today that no longer earn $ from services or products, but instead seek profits only in mergers and acquisitions. Think about it... A $4 BILLION fee for "failing to merge". A $4 BILLION fee for leaving the situation as just as it is now ???? I doubt the upper echelons of AT&T are even remotely concerned with service to customers. . |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|