![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Master Dwellar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,197
|
huh. imagine that. now i'm a leo? really? my son too? mmmmalright.
__________________
For your dreams to come true, you must first have a dream. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Back in 10
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,684
|
New zodiac signs 2011: There is no astrology change with your horoscope
"But before astrology fans scrape the ink from their arms because they think they're now a Virgo instead of a Libra, they should consider this: If they adhered to the tropical zodiac - which, if they're a Westerner, they probably did - absolutely nothing has changed for them. That's worth rephrasing: If you considered yourself a Cancer under the tropical zodiac last week, you're still a Cancer under the same zodiac this week. That's because the tropical zodiac - which is fixed to seasons, and which Western astrology adheres to - differs from the sidereal zodiac - which is fixed to constellations and is followed more in the East, and is the type of zodiac to which the Star Tribune article ultimately refers."
__________________
Speaking simply... do not confuse this with having a simple mind. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|