|
|
|||||||
| Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-31-2010, 07:41 PM
|
#661 | |
|
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
A controversy with one study proves thousands of other studies are all wrong? Yes, if one tainted paper proves a political agenda. You are again perverting reality just as you did with "Tsonis’ paper is about non-linear mathematics in weather simulations – not about a conclusion from an unproven simulation. Funny how a political agenda never bothered to notice the difference. ". Why did you so avidly hype that paper as proof of global cooling? Then go so strangely quiet once the paper’s contents were quoted? Hate of Islam. Perversion of science. Saddam's WMDs. Trying to get into war with China over a silly spy plane. Subverting the American economy to enrich the rich and lower American's income by 2%. Making Wall Street fraud legal. All but protecting bin Laden. Constant cheapshots at Obama. Destruction of America’s manned space program. Blaming Obama for your hate promoted by wacko extremism. My god. You even advocated putting social security into the stock market.. At what point do you learn reality before spouting wacko extremist rhetoric? At what point do you first learn science before knowing something? You would even take emails out of context to promote your agenda. Methodology in that IPC study is suspect. Nothing more. Thousands of other studies confirm global warming. Including sudden increases in ocean acidity directly traceable to oceans now absorbing so much CO2 – that you say does not exist. You even claimed global cooling is ongoing because wackos (and even one Oklahoma(?) Senator) told you what to believe. No wonder you avidly advocate hate of Muslims in Lower Manhattan. No wonder a government from 2000 to 2008 did so much harm to America for a political agenda. At what point do you apologize for so much damage done by wacko extremism? At what point do you apologize for the 4,400 American soldiers who died for extremist beliefs? So you now invent another enemy - IPC. classicman avidly promoted that Tsonis paper as proof that global warming does not exist. He was left to hang himself for a few days. Then the paper’s contents were provided. Suddenly classicman went quiet. Would not discuss it anymore. Strange how he never bothers to learn facts. Strange how he so quickly recited wacko extremist mantra. He is doing it again under orders from Hannity, Beck, Limbaugh, and other extremists. No wonder the Cellar has been so full of Muslim hate. Tsonis proved global cooling exists. You could not bother to first learn facts? Only point of the IPC study is the methodology behind that one study. How quickly you cite one paper – and ignore results from thousands that demonstrate why your political agenda is about spin, lies, and propaganda. |
|
|
|
|
08-31-2010, 07:45 PM
|
#662 |
|
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
This famous "marketplace" will eventually settle this issue.
People who believe there is no such a thing as global warming will start buying property on low-lying coastlines, while the believers will start selling. Maybe the people of Bangladesh, Republic of Marshall Islands, the Maldives, Tuvalu, Kiribati and other small island states will finally get rich. ... or Denver is going to have one heck of a population explosion. |
|
|
|
|
08-31-2010, 07:58 PM
|
#663 | |
|
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-31-2010, 08:43 PM
|
#664 |
|
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
Evidence that contradicts the ruling belief system is held to extraordinary standards, while evidence that entrenches it is uncritically accepted. -Carl Sagan
For proof see the above personal attack filled with lies half-truths and additional outright fallacies, misconceptions and misrepresentations. |
|
|
|
|
08-31-2010, 09:46 PM
|
#665 | |
|
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
Quote:
Extraordinary standards: 100% of all scientists (and people who can be quoted as if they were scientists) must agree, or there isn't consensus. Uncritically accepted: the occasional study that can be (sometimes mis)interpreted as casting doubt.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2010, 04:06 AM
|
#667 |
|
I'm still a jerk
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Little Mexico
Posts: 1,817
|
Classic what does CO2 do in the atmosphere?
__________________
"Without deviation from the norm progress is not possible." - Frank Zappa It is the ignorance of ignorance that lead to the death of knowledge The Virgin Mary does not weep for her son, for he is in paradise. She weeps for the world , for we are in suffering. |
|
|
|
|
09-01-2010, 10:00 AM
|
#668 |
|
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Global warming post of the Beast
Last edited by Lamplighter; 09-01-2010 at 10:10 AM. |
|
|
|
|
09-01-2010, 10:31 AM
|
#669 | |
|
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
Quote:
The extraordinary standard that the global warming deniers are using is that no matter how lopsided the evidence is, it's not conclusive as long as they can find someone (preferably with a PhD) to deny it. What extraordinary standard are opposing studies held up to? Sure, they will be scrutinized more; Sagan had human nature correct. But any extraordinary standard in the scientific community pales in comparison to that which the deniers use.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2010, 10:58 AM
|
#670 |
|
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
Oh dear, HM.
Attacking the science is the correct approach. Attacking the believers, on either side, is not. |
|
|
|
|
09-01-2010, 10:59 AM
|
#671 | |
|
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
|
Quote:
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice. --Bill Cosby |
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2010, 11:00 AM
|
#672 | |
|
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
Quote:
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2010, 11:02 AM
|
#674 | |
|
Makes some feel uncomfortable
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
|
Quote:
__________________
 "I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2010, 11:05 AM
|
#675 | |
|
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Quote:
No evil intended. It was the posting number on this thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
