Impeding changes to our Health Care system

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

No Dux represents one group. I represent myself and the views of many groups.

I would advise those many people you represent to stand back when you step in your own shit, like you did here:

Originally Posted by Redux

...On one hand, you claim the Exchanges are a fantasy and on the other hand, you insist they are a pay-off to the insurance industry…..

Then you post a column from a Democratic Senator from 4 months ago and claim he agreed that the Exchanges would not work, when in fact, he was complaining at the time that the early draft of the committee bill did not include Exchanges anywhere near those in the final bill.

From there, you post a CBO letter on one small component of the bill related to one level of coverage to be offered in the Exchange and claim that updated it the overall CBO earlier findings on costs and saving and invalidated them.

Followed by the typical twists and dodges with each contradiction or misrepresentation.

Facts?


Seriously, dude. The overwhelming majority of your posts are not facts, they are your opinion....or the opinions of libertarian/conservative columnists and/or industry spokespeople with an agenda

Why is it so hard for you to accept that others have equally valid opinions.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Redux

Why is it so hard for you to accept that others have opinions.

Oh I do, I just don't believe the ones posted directly from White House Talking Points or the Demoncratic party line... like 90% of yours.

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

Oh I do, I just don't believe the ones posted directly from White House Talking Points or the Demoncratic party line... like 90% of yours.

I would say 90% of your "snips" are the opinions of libertarian/conservative columnists, industry spokespeople and/or Republican members of Congress (see below) with an agenda.

So whats the difference?

Oh...I know one difference.

I actually take the time to cite the legislation (and related facts) when I can......like in response to the latest non-partisan (?) nonsense you posted from a Republican member of Congress.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Redux

I would say 90% of your "snips" are the opinions of libertarian/conservative columnists and/or industry spokespeople with an agenda.

So whats the difference?

1 narrow view vs. Many.

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

1 narrow view vs. Many.

Half the country shares my view to some extent and half shares yours to the same extent.

But only one of us constantly resorts to name calling and character assassination.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Redux

Half the country shares my view to some extent and half shares yours to the same extent.

Sure, you keep believing that, see you in Nov...

But only one of us constantly resorts to name calling and character assassination.

What? you want me to start posting Youtube vids of Nancy Pelosi???!?! Get off your liberal high horse. You snivel to much.

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

Sure, you keep believing that, see you in Nov...

What? you want me to start posting Youtube vids of Nancy Pelosi???!?! Get off your liberal high horse. You snivel to much.

I know it pisses you off when I call you out on the facts, like your most recent "letter from Cantor" (or those other recent posts of yours I referenced)...it makes your partisanship and ignorance of the facts public for all to see.

And you know it too...and perhaps one day you will man-up and acknowledge that facts, even those that I cite, are more credible than the incessant snips you contribute.

And maybe once, you will actually contribute something constructive to a discussion here.