Hey, I'm just trying to understand how on one hand you say
"More regulation is not the solution. That is stupid" but on the other hand, you want to
"eliminate non-commercial banks abilities to provide low cost loans to people who never could have afforded them in the first place"
Seems like a contradiction to me. I simply
asked how you could accomplish that.
I fail to see how that means I
"hate it when Americans stand up and dissent."
added:
BTW, my personal opinions on policy issues are not based on popularity, although I think most Americans favor a greater federal regulatory role over banks and financial services, but that is irrelevant to the discussion.