Man Arrested for Trespassing on Own Property

Juniper · 12-04-2009, 03:51 PM

Tell me if I am reading this wrong. Jerry E., the father, signed the agreement in 1949, and the company tried to pay him but he refused.

The man arrested was Jeremy E., the son, who owns property next to his father's. He did not sign any agreement (at least not described in this excerpt). Therefore any agreement previously made, payments previously made, would only affect the father's property, not the son's.

Eminent domain is a bitch, but at least he ought to get some compensation for being wrongfully arrested and be reimbursed for the impounding of his ATV.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

12-04-2009, 03:51 PM	#14
Juniper I know, right? Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,539	Tell me if I am reading this wrong. Jerry E., the father, signed the agreement in 1949, and the company tried to pay him but he refused. The man arrested was Jeremy E., the son, who owns property next to his father's. He did not sign any agreement (at least not described in this excerpt). Therefore any agreement previously made, payments previously made, would only affect the father's property, not the son's. Eminent domain is a bitch, but at least he ought to get some compensation for being wrongfully arrested and be reimbursed for the impounding of his ATV.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)