![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
View Poll Results: Do you support saving the US auto companies with tax payer money? | |||
I support saving any one or all of them. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 3.13% |
I support assisting them for a limited time with a limited amount. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | 34.38% |
I don't support saving them. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 59.38% |
I have another plan to save them from certain death (explain below) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 3.13% |
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Selling off America is necessary to pay for George Jr economic stimulus plans. Fiat will get Chrysler for peanuts. Cerebus Capital (Nardelli and friends) will be wiped out. Daimler will pay $1billion to Chrysler's pension funds. And America will sell off the remains to Fiat. What will Fiat bring to save Chrysler? How did the French save Nissan? Same example used by Carlos Ghosen of Renault to save Nissan will probably be used by Sergio Marchionne to save Chrysler. How Marchionne first did the same thing in Fiat: Quote:
Same concept were implemented by Iacocca in Chrysler and Petersen in Ford. Ford reduced 48 layers of management until only 5 remained. Same problem exists in Chrysler. Obama was shocked to learn that Chrysler had 10 times more management just in public communications compared to Fiat. A problem routinely found when management comes from business schools. Where image is more important than the product. So much management means a company in denial, innovation cannot happen, and unions get blamed. All symptoms in both Chrysler and GM. Ghosen had to eliminate the same 'blame the employees' attitude - stop massive corporate infighting - before Nissan could be rescued. But management changes alone will not solve Chrysler. The bottom line: Chrysler products, like their factories, still suck. Fiat under Marchionne had previously worked with GM to develop a new engine technology called (if I remember) multiple air porting. GM management suddenly backed out claiming the technology was too complex. But GM engineers privately said they were both shocked and impressed at the technical knowledge in Fiat. End result was that GM had to pay Fiat $2billion to end their alliance (yes GM's Wagoner was that stupid). Rumors suggest that Fiat will soon introduce this revolutionary engine this year. Fiat would market these innovations through their newly acquired dealer network - which is Chrysler’s biggest asset. If this new engine technology is as innovative as the CVCC was to Honda (a Ford innovation stifled by Henry Ford for almost 20 years) or if as innovative as the 70 Hp per liter engine was to most all foreign automakers (a GM innovation stifled for 17 years), then Chrysler may be saved. A solution that addresses the product and that eliminates a reason for 85% of Chrysler's problems. Of course, most Chrysler manufacturing is in Canada. Marchionne has residual problems. He is still working on many Fiat problems. For example, like GM, Fiat had 19 platforms. That ridiculous number will only be down to six in 2012. Fiat still has many internal problems. Can Marchionne also implement massive management changes in both American and Canada? Rescuing Chrysler will be a legendary solution that, of course, requires management that understands how the work gets done. GM needs solutions just as radical. No import vehicle was going to save GM. Would a Ute save Pontiac? Of course not. Wagoner had to also be removed because solutions this radical are not possible under current GM management. The need for change this radical has been obvious even a decade ago – when the reader ignored propaganda and goes for the facts with a Great White attitude. Clinton tried to save them in the 1990s when the problems were glaringly obvious. But an extremist agenda was to eliminate anything that represented or was started by Clinton. All this could have been averted. Will government mandated change be severe enough - or too little too late? Yes, most people have little grasp of what is required to save these auto companies. Instead some even waste time with silly nonsense even about too much government in business. So many people remain in denial how bad both GM and Chrysler really are - financially, management wise, and products. Last edited by tw; 04-30-2009 at 10:20 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Professor
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
|
Quote:
Does anyone know if there are any crinimal investigations going on into the people/institutions that caused the economic collapse? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
Quote:
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|