![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
to live and die in LA
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,090
|
Setting aside the political perspectives on individual issues, do you think it more likely that Obama's potential nominations to the Supreme Court will be constructionists, or judicial activists?
It seems much more likely to me that a key litmus test for any supreme court nominee that passes through nomination by Obama and approval by a Democratic senate will be that judges' willingness to expand the power of the federal government in interpreting the constitution.
__________________
to live and die in LA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Constitutional Scholar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,006
|
Quote:
I consider Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito to all be activist judges who think they have the authority to ignore the Constitution when it is in favor of governmental "interests". They are granted no such power by the Constitution. I'd certainly hope that any judges nominated by Obama will defend the RIGHT of a woman to get an abortion at any stage of pregnancy for any reason, or no reason she wants without any permission, notification, or oversight from any other person, group of people, or government entity. I'd like to see more judges who recognize that there are limits on what the government may or may not do, and which laws it may or may not create.
__________________
"I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death." - George Carlin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|