BattleCry and Teenage Brainwashing

Originally Posted by tw

Of course it answers the question. The question is xoxoxoBruce as characteristized by his denigrating the Economist. It was

What question are you looking at? Only question remaining is why xoxoxoBruce has become so antisocial complete with profanity. Profanity posted only when he cannot explain why he has these fits. Why does he now post insult and accusations without facts? He did this same thing when insisting global warming did not exist; but could not explain why.

tw then facetiouly said
"The Economist is anti-American because it is published by Brits." That post ignited an emotional and illogical Bruce. What is the topic? The new xoxoxoBruce - who today is back to posting more like the old Bruce - no profanity; just the facts.

So its not anti-American?
What is your issue with a straight answer?

[tw]

Originally Posted by rkzenrage

So its not anti-American?

You have the right answer. I repeatedly confirmed that I posted facetiously. You even quoted Happy Monkey who summarized what was obvious:

tw cited the Economist.
Bruce sarcastically referred to it as "...patriotic American... oh wait, that's a British publication".
tw then facetiouly said
"The Economist is anti-American because it is published by Brits."

Where is the problem? Or did you only read the intentional distortion by TheMercenary who coat tailed a joke on a facetious reply. Happy Monkey so easily summarized reality, you would even quote it, Happy Monkey’s summary would be confirmed by the author, and still you want it explained?

Bruce was disparaging The Economist because tw reads it and sometimes quotes from it. Bruce’s post was a backhanded slap that was followed with an obviously facetious reply. How many times must it be explained by multiple people?

Kudos to TheMercenary for playing a joke so effectively.