They're Watching You

[Kitsune]

Originally Posted by tw

TWhich one were you trying to suggest?

Re-read my post. Notice I imply nothing, notice I take no stance on it. Pardon me for pointing out something I considered interesting and relevant to the conversation.

I said: "Hey look, other countries do this, too!"
I did not say: "Other countries do this, too, and that makes it the right thing! I feel so strongly about this, in fact, that I feel we should throw out the fourth amendment and let the police state run wild!"

I agree with your point of view and you still managed to attack me.

[tw]

Originally Posted by Kitsune

I agree with your point of view and you still managed to attack me.

Kitsune - I attacked no one. I did as I always do. I make no effort to be polite -becaouse only children need everything polite. Instead I am blunt honest. I only asked a question as to how your post related to the subject. Why? Because it could be interpreted many different ways. Why is it relevant what the British do when we do same thing? Provided was how your post could be interpreted in the context of this dicussion.

Reread that post. It only asks a question and demonstrates ways of interpreting how your post fits into context. You assumed an attack only because of word selection with is never ever choosen to be polite or politically correct. I just asked a question. If I attacked you, it would have been stated bluntly as an attack.

Are you saying we should scrap the American Bill of Rights because British demonstrate the Bill is unnecessary?

A perfect oppurtunity for you to clarify your intentions of that post, which to me were not entirely clear. Why then do you assume an attack? This is me. I never waste words with political correctness. What I have posted is only what I have posted with nothing implied. I don't imply. If I think you are an asshole, then I say so. If I had attacked your thought process, then you would see sentences such as "Kitsune rewrites history for his own personal agenda".

If it is not bluntly stated, then an attack does not exist. Post is nothing more than a simple question. So are you suggesting we should scrap the Bill of Rights? Should I assume your answer is NO due to your last post that only discusses the Fourth Amendment?