![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Recruit or Something
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
2ndly, all spending is a tax. Regardless of how the monies collected, it still needs to be paid for somehow. The only way to actually cut taxes in the long run, is to cut spending waving some majic government wand to restructure how taxes are collected isn't going to solve that problem. There's no way for the government to take 2 trillion dollars out of the ecconomy with-out causing serious disruptions. I don't think we should settle for replacing the current tax scheme with another one. If all those people who spend all their energy towards restructuring actually spent their energy trying to repeal it, repealing it would be possible. Especially since, as I said, repealing the income tax would only decrease government revenues down to about Clinton era currently. It seems to me that it's practical and even pragmatic to advocate the abolishion of the income tax. Oynx, sounds to me like you're on a form of welfare dole. The difference between the $3500 that you would have paid in, and the $6000 in child tax credits ($2500) is other peoples money. Money the government took from other people to give to you. I understand, you've got to live in the system though. Tracy
__________________
http://www.geocities.com/tracysaboe/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Junior Master Dwellar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kingdom of Atlantia
Posts: 2,979
|
Quote:
edited.
__________________
Impotentes defendere libertatem non possunt. "Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth." ~Franklin D. Roosevelt Last edited by OnyxCougar; 04-19-2005 at 05:54 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|