President-elect Trump

[Glinda]

The dude is 88 years old. Who they gonna blame when he croaks?

[Griff]

They’ve already identified Bezos as the next scarey guy.

[glatt]

BEZOS!!!

*shakes fist at the sky*



Do it. It's fun.

[tw]

Originally Posted by Glinda

The dude is 88 years old. Who they gonna blame when he croaks?

Its called extremism. Keep throwing names on the wall until something sticks. The Don tried to do it with Birthing. It failed He tried immigrants. Then found massive support from low educated extremists who are threatened by those more productive immigrants

In the UK, Labour is using anti-semitism. That appears to be working for them.

[Rhianne]

Originally Posted by tw

In the UK, Labour is using anti-semitism. That appears to be working for them.

The Labour/anti-Semitism story is an important one, but one you appear to have entirely misunderstood.

I'm seeing a pattern.

[tw]

Originally Posted by Rhianne

The Labour/anti-Semitism story is an important one, but one you appear to have entirely misunderstood.

A vague statement without anything that provides perspective and without supporting facts, then it is a classic example of fake news. An honest statement always explains the what and whys. That soundbyte is classic emotion. Post in adult manner. Explain what that statement means and why it has credibility.

Using only emotions rather than facts to make a conclusion is why fake news exists. Since that conclusion is only one sentence, then it is obviously a lie. Explain a conclusion derived from facts; not fake news from emotions.

[Rhianne]

Originally Posted by tw

A vague statement without anything that provides perspective and without supporting facts, then it is a classic example of fake news. An honest statement always explains the what and whys. That soundbyte is classic emotion. Post in adult manner. Explain what that statement means and why it has credibility.

Using only emotions rather than facts to make a conclusion is why fake news exists. Since that conclusion is only one sentence, then it is obviously a lie. Explain a conclusion derived from facts; not fake news from emotions.

You appear to require higher standards from me than you set for yourself.

In the UK, Labour is using anti-semitism. That appears to be working for them.

Maybe you would be good enough to explain to us how Labour is "using" anti-Semitism and how that is "working for them" to provide some credibility.

[tw]

Originally Posted by Rhianne

You appear to require higher standards from me than you set for yourself.

So again posted is nothing to support an emotional opinion that is even contradicted by Tony Blair in a recent interview. It is called throwing shit at the wall to discover what sticks. Labour has got itself stuck into anti-Semitism since 2015, in part, because Corbyn is a power broker - not a leader.

A guide to Labour Party anti-Semitism claims

Some of this was cited elsewhere including the Brexit thread.

An adult reply, as requested, would have included at least one fact to justify that one sentence emotion. Still not posted, apparently, because you were told what to think. And did not bother to first learn facts.

You could prove me wrong by finally posting a fact. I don't expect it. I expect to read more insults and naysay replies.

Corbyn, who actually favors Brexit, is simply playing power games at the expense of the British economy. Britain has a serious leadership problem. Anti-Semitism is simply more morass that Corbyn has gotten Labour sucked into.