Saddam captured

FileNotFound · 12-15-2003, 09:04 AM

I agree with everything that Radar has said.

The capture of Saddam means nothing more than that the US troops might get to go home sooner.

The US should never have been involved in the first place.

Oh and Kitsune: None.

Not a SINGLE ONE.

Not even WWII. Japan attacked because they felt that war was innevitable because the US was showing itself as an ally against the Axis.

Can you honestly tell me that not a single American being killed in a war in the past 100 years would have been a BAD thing?

12-15-2003, 09:04 AM	#11
FileNotFound Intouch with his inner sheep rider. Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 603	I agree with everything that Radar has said. The capture of Saddam means nothing more than that the US troops might get to go home sooner. The US should never have been involved in the first place. Oh and Kitsune: None. Not a SINGLE ONE. Not even WWII. Japan attacked because they felt that war was innevitable because the US was showing itself as an ally against the Axis. Can you honestly tell me that not a single American being killed in a war in the past 100 years would have been a BAD thing? __________________ This is a rat. \|This is a hamster.\| This is a chipmunk.\| This is a Sheep Rider.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)