Vaccination & epidemic

[Clodfobble]

Originally Posted by tw

Now you are discussing scientifically. Such studies would be useful, informative, and how one goes about developing a hypothesis. If demonstrated that some human bodies do not detoxify themselves of particular heavy metals, then a useful fact has been provided. I have never heard of this. But then such strange medical exceptions can occur.

Yes, such studies would be useful, informative, and scientific. Several small-scale versions have been done, with the conclusions I have outlined above, but the funding for such things is extremely limited. If only someone big--like, I don't know, the CDC--could be bothered to look into it.

Originally Posted by tw

To know, both the intake and outbreak of those metals must be measured. Only measuring outgoing concentrations is too subjective - if for no other reason because the concentrations may not be detectable at all by that testing standard.

Unfortunately it's nearly impossible to measure the daily intake of metal, and it's unethical to the extreme to deliberately dose someone with a known poison. However, it's easy to determine normal versus abnormal results: In a normal person, a certain amount of metals can be measured in the urine, and then following a challenge dose of chelation drugs, that baseline amount should stay the same. The drug does nothing because the body is already outputting everything that goes in. If, on the other hand, the drug causes a large increase in the amount excreted, one can assume there is a certain backlog of metals in the body, because you can generally be certain that the individual was not suddenly exposed to such high levels of anything in the previous six hours.