The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-21-2009, 07:25 PM   #11
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble View Post
You're not even making sense. Do you understand that the "medication" we're discussing here contains mercury?
Do you understand that foods you eat, air you breath, and water you drink also contain mercury? You have again done what junk science and political extremists do. Promote a fear subjectively. Not provide numbers.

If mercury in that medication was so destructive, then fluorescent bulbs must be killing people.

Your posts contain subjective reasoning, devoid of the always required numbers, and are based only on statistically insignificant observation. Subjective claims and proof based only in observation are classic symptoms of junk science. The exact same reasoning also proved Saddam had WMDs.

Amazing how many know science intentionally wants to subvert us. Ironically, those who most promote these myths have no science background. Often are educated in religion, politics, English, or other subjective disciplines.

Same reasoning also proved that childhood leukemia was directly traceable to AC electric lines. Once the data was finally provided, that myth (just like an autism myth) was completely debunked.

Do you understand that foods also contain radioactive material? Where is your campaign to eliminate naturally grown foods because radiation is so dangerous? Another example of fears based only in hearsay because numbers and perspective were not provided.

Worse, your every proof is based only subjective observations. Observation alone is a symptom of junk science. But your observation are also subjective – even less reliable. At least the myth about childhood leukemia was based in numbers – before it was discovered to be another junk science conclusion.

Last edited by tw; 11-21-2009 at 07:41 PM.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.