05-24-2009, 12:51 PM
|
#16
|
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
forgot to add this link for those of you looking to delete accounts from various sites.
and this BBC article
Quote:
The Cambridge University researchers said special photo-sharing sites, such as Flickr and Google's Picasa, did better and Microsoft's Windows Live Spaces removed the photos instantly.
To perform their experiment, the researchers uploaded photos to each of the sites, then deleted them, but kept a note of direct URLs to the photos from the sites' content delivery networks.
When they checked 30 days later, these links continued to work for seven of the sites even though a typical user might think the photos had been removed.
Lazy approach
Joseph Bonneau, one of the PhD students who carried out the study, said: "This demonstrates how social networking sites often take a lazy approach to user privacy, doing what's simpler rather than what is correct.
"It's imperative to view privacy as a design constraint, not a legal add-on."
But a Facebook spokesman defended the company's approach saying; "When a user deletes a photograph from Facebook it is removed from our servers immediately.
"However, URLs to photographs may continue to exist on the Content Delivery Network (CDN) after users delete them from Facebook, until they are overwritten.
"Overwriting usually happens after a short period of time."
Users of Facebook staged a revolt recently over rules which would have given the site permanent ownership of their data.
|
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
|
|
|