The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-30-2009, 07:20 PM   #11
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
AIG's original creators of that derivatives group got removed because they were not making sufficient profits. Instead they were being responsible. The employees who replaced them, who created the massive losses, and who were then getting bonuses were doing what is too common in financial markets. Promoting profits rather than doing their job. They operated as salesmen - not responsible analyst of risk. Mysteriously, spin says they still deserved bonuses for seeking higher profits rather than responsible contracts.

Your financial advisor is only a salesman. As so many critics note, the advisor rarely - almost never - tells you to get out when it was so obvious in October and November. Their interests do not correspond with clients. Their objective is only their own profits - not the job of serving clients. That is the problem and just another reason why financial markets require heavy regulation.

This ‘greed is good and screw the customer’ mentality works as long as markets go up.

Profits are objectives of the mafia and these finance people. We know mafiosi have no interest serving a customer. But that routine contempt that finance people have for their customers is appalling and is why finance markets can never be deregulated.

Responsible bonuses. Nobody gets them until four to ten years later when the spread sheets actually report an employee’s real achievements. But that is also contrary to myths so popular on Wall Street. Finance people foolishly believe work done this year appear on the spread sheets this year. Nonsense. One need only look at GM whose management (Rick Wagoner) sucked so bad that four years later, Wagoner set new world records for industry losses – even long before anyone heard of AIG. Massive losses even when the auto industry was setting new records for sales.

But Wagoner got big bonuses every year. According to classicman – retention bonuses because he was doing so much good for GM.

Companies that are doing so much better don’t have those big management bonuses. How curious. How to make a more productive company. Less (smaller and fewer) bonuses. Industries where contempt for America is highest also dish out massive and record numbers of bonuses even when they lose money and go running to government for protection.

In AIG, people who would not commit to so many of those risks (and could have averted much of this) were replaced for being responsible and cautious. Such attitudes are heresy on Wall Street this past decade where profits are more important than America.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.