![]() |
|
Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing |
View Poll Results: Who does homosexuality hurt? | |||
Everyone |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 8.82% |
The people participating |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 2.94% |
Traditional couples |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
The children |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 2.94% |
No one |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
31 | 91.18% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 |
When Do I Get Virtual Unreality?
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Raytown, Missouri
Posts: 12,719
|
Let's bring this thread, for once, back to reality...
If two dudes who are happily buggering one another, or two ladies happily slurping the juices, decide that they wish to be legally and morally entangled for all of time... Why, how, where, when...can it damage *anything*? People who love each other should be allowed to enter a legally binding agreement based on nothing more than their love, and it shouldn't matter whether they have tab A going into slot B or whatever. Any heterosexual couple is allowed, nay, *encouraged* to do this whenever they please. Why should a couple who has two tab A's or slots B be different? I dare anyone to provide a serious argument as to why this premise is wrong on any level.
__________________
"To those of you who are wearing ties, I think my dad would appreciate it if you took them off." - Robert Moog |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|