The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Home Base
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-08-2006, 09:44 AM   #11
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flint
There are two interpretations for this. Both are possible, but neither is specified by the provided information.

#1: If the "forward speed" is defined as relative to the treadmill then the plane is stationary relative to the air.

#2: If the "forward speed" is defined as relative to the ground, then it is possible for the plane to be in motion relative to the air.

Nothing in the question rules out either of these interpretations, and no amount of blustery hoopla or physics masturbation can change that.
The question was written from the point of view of an observer, right? That observer is the one doing the measuring of the forward speed. It's forward speed relative to the observer.

That observer could be:
1. standing on the ground,
2. floating in the air,
3. standing on the treadmill, or
4. sitting in the plane

1&2: If the "forward speed" observer were in situation 1 or 2, the question would be written as it is, and the forward speed of the plane would be measured relative the the observer, which is the same as the ground. This would be your interpretation #2. It's how I and most here read the question.

3: If the observer is standing on the treadmill (3), he/she would have the perspective of the treadmill. If the treadmill starts moving, the observer won't feel motion because they are attached to the treadmill, They will feel a tailwind. Since the observer is writing the question, the question would be about planes taxiing in tailwinds, not about moving runways. The question doesn't mention winds anywhere, so the question is not from the point of view of the treadmill, and the plane's forward speed is not measured from that reference. Your interpretation #1 above is not a credible interpretation of the question as written, because nowhere does the question mention wind. Wind is not a part of the question, and the question does not mention wind. While this post may contain wind, there is none in the question.

4:Finally, if the observer is in the plane, he/she will see both the ground move and the runway move even faster. I don't think anyone believes this is written from the point of view of the plane, so I won't go into it further.

Last edited by glatt; 12-08-2006 at 09:52 AM.
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.