![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
No that is bull crap. It was Bush against the Demoncratically controlled Congress. That was the crux of the constant struggle to get things done. Pelosi and Reid own it. They have owned the failures of Congress for the last two years. If things have not been done on the Congressional side of the house it is in their lap no matter how much they traditionally want to pass the buck. The Demoncrats will own the responsibility of the failures of Congress for the last two years and that includes their failures to compromise with the minority. Sorry, that is the way it is.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
So...all those polls are bull crap....and president vetoes (or veto threats) dont matter at all.
I love it! |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Certainly you don't think for one minute that all of your efforts are some how going to convince me that you are correct about anything you have said.
![]() Polls? you referrenced them, I gave them back to you. Enjoy the lies of statistics.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Of course I dont.
There is one of you in every political forum ![]() Im off to bed...Sleep well and secure in your beliefs! |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
No problem. I sleep well when I know that we can agree to disagree.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! Last edited by TheMercenary; 02-06-2009 at 01:16 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
Horrible Bastard
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: High Desert, Arizona
Posts: 1,103
|
Quote:
Face facts, Merc...there is no actual difference between the parties. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
There may be little difference in the manner in which they act, but there are significant differences in their respective policy approaches to government. The stimulus bill is a perfect example. The Democrats want to spend to create jobs, potentially over 3 million in 18 months according to the CBO...and the Republicans want to lower taxes to create jobs, the failed economic policy of Bush and the previous Republican Congresses, with the near $trillion in tax cuts in 01 and 03. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
I would agree.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Quote:
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
Professor
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
|
ummm, that wasn't Pelosi and Reid, that was Hank Paulson. the democrats wrote stuff in the bill about executive pay, but apparently Bush snuck in some clause that negated what they wrote to protect the taxpayers, and because Paulson was exclusively in charge of that money, he changed what it was supposed to be used for and gave it to his buddies on Wall Street.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |
Professor
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
|
Quote:
The truth is, democrats always try to get along. They always make concessions. Republicans NEVER do. When Clinton was in office, they completely shut down the government for, what was it, 2 weeks or something? When have democrats ever been so unreasonable? And... republicans would do it again today, even with our economy slipping into the abyss, because they don't give a shit about the people of this country. They only care about their base, and their ideology. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
In fact, more jobs could probably be created in the short term if there was more spending (on infrastructure projects, etc) and less tax cuts, but the Democrats compromised by accepting tax cuts to make it more bi-partisan. Tax cuts have never produced jobs in the short term., unless you have data that would suggest otherwise...cite please. I would urge you to take the time to look at the CBO analysis of the bill in its present form ...nearly 2/3 of the funds will be expended in 18 months and potentially creating more than 3 million jobs..there are no guarantees, economics is not an exact science. Much of the rest is to ensure longer term job stability. Perhaps you have other objective data....cite please! Last edited by Redux; 02-06-2009 at 06:52 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#44 | |
Professor
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
|
Quote:
It works like this: if people aren't spending money, because they've lost their jobs, or they're afraid of losing their jobs, then companies and businesses lose money. They can't keep producing things (or buying things to supply to people) because people aren't buying. So, businesses continue to lay people off, or worse, they close their doors. If NO ONE is buying anything, then the government can help by pumping money into the economy. If it's in the form of food stamps or unemployment, there is a return of something like $1.75 for every dollar spent (according to Moody's). If it's in the form of tax cuts, it's more like .50 on the dollar (or less), give or take, depending on what kind of tax cut it is (I believe there was one tax that would actually help, but I can't remember what it was called). Giving money to poor people or lower income people puts money into the economy more than giving it to anyone else, because they will spend it. They have to. Middle class people (or wealthier people) are more likely to save it, which isn't usually a bad thing, but at the moment, we need people to buy things. Otherwise, more jobs are lost. Giving the money to states (which many are broke or nearly broke) will ultimately help save jobs, because they are having to cut their budgets, which means laying off people like cops and teachers (hello! education spending! which repubs want to cut out of the bill). But republicans don't want to give money to the states either. They don't want to give money to fund education. They don't want ANY spending. All they want is friggin' tax cuts for the wealthy. The truth is, spending DOES stimulate the economy, no matter what form it takes. I have a question for all those republicans who think government should play no part in anything, and that government should be kept really, really small, what the hell are you doing in a job that has no place in society? I mean really, they want to get rid of almost all government, hey, them first. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Where's the beef?
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|