The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2008, 06:10 PM   #1
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Why the Powell Endorsement (Could) Matter

From the Washington Post of 17 Oct 2008:
Quote:
Why the Powell Endorsement (Could) Matter
The news that retired Gen. Colin Powell will appear this Sunday on "Meet the Press" has set off a frenzy of speculation that former secretary of State could throw his endorsement to Barack Obama.

Powell has made little secret of his admiration for the Illinois senator in the past but has always stopped short of outright endorsing him.

Will that change on Sunday? And, if it does, how much is Powell's endorsement really worth?

Seen through the prism of our handy-dandy endorsement hierarchy, Powell's endorsement of Obama would qualify as the highest powered of all endorsements: a symbolic one.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 11:26 AM   #2
richlevy
King Of Wishful Thinking
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 6,669
Well, he did come out for Obama. I explained here in the "Military Polls" thread what my impressions were.

In short, Powell, besides being a black general, is a moderate Republican intellectual icon. His defection mirrors the defection or abstention of a large number of conservative intellectuals who think a liberal intellectual would be better than a conservative wedded to the current Republican base.

It was a great interview. I recommend everyone catch the repeats of "Meet the Press". Or just watch it here.

BTW, McCain will take the high road on this, but watch for what happens with the 'red meat' Republicans. The smart ones will refrain from trying to tear down Powell, but as I mentioned earlier, there are less and less smart ones left.

__________________
Exercise your rights and remember your obligations - VOTE!
I have always believed that hope is that stubborn thing inside us that insists, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us so long as we have the courage to keep reaching, to keep working, to keep fighting. -- Barack Hussein Obama

Last edited by richlevy; 10-19-2008 at 11:31 AM.
richlevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 11:49 AM   #3
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
He's very convincing, in fact Powell convinced me there were WMD in Iraq with his speech to the UN.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 01:41 PM   #4
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad View Post
He's very convincing, in fact Powell convinced me there were WMD in Iraq with his speech to the UN.
Facts he was not sure were even acurate. And after it came out that they were not he was truely pissed off. Of all the previous Bush appointments I have the highest respect for him and Paul O'Neil, I can't remember her name, Dee Myers??? the first press sec?
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 02:09 PM   #5
richlevy
King Of Wishful Thinking
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Posts: 6,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Of all the previous Bush appointments I have the highest respect for him and Paul O'Neil, I can't remember her name, Dee Myers??? the first press sec?
Well, it's going to be a bloodbath tomorrow when the surrogates attack his credibility, service, etc. The politicians will be bad enough, but I can just imagine Hannity and ilk.

I can already hear Coulter screaming "Treason".
__________________
Exercise your rights and remember your obligations - VOTE!
I have always believed that hope is that stubborn thing inside us that insists, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us so long as we have the courage to keep reaching, to keep working, to keep fighting. -- Barack Hussein Obama
richlevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 03:23 PM   #6
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Powell was one of the few Whitehouse figures that I had/have respect for out of the last eight years. He was one of the ones that made me think (until I heard Blix interviewed) Saddam might have weapons of mass destruction. he must have been so fucking annoyed when he realised he'd been given shitty intelligence.

Of all of them, he was one of the few I genuinely believe and believed had no knowledge of the dishonesty of those reports.
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 07:28 PM   #7
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
He was one of the ones that made me think Saddam might have weapons of mass destruction. he must have been so fucking annoyed when he realised he'd been given shitty intelligence.
More likely he knew he was lying.

Colin Powell had a dinner meeting with George Jr, Laura, and Condi Rice. He knew the president was going to war no matter what. Therefore he told the president that as Sec of State, he was required to make the president's case before the UN. IOW Powel had commited to making the case for war regardless of facts.

When he went to the CIA, he spent 14 hour days all week looking for those facts. If those facts were 'slam dunk', then everything could have been obtained in a day. But proof after proof presented to Powell was found lacking or obviously a lie.

When Powel gave that UN speech, I felt so sorry for him. Presented facts had already been found wanting by responsible sources. If those were the best he could do, then clearly, justification for war did not exist.

I specifically remember thinking this poor man has been blindsided by the administration. As a good soldier, he was following orders. Of course, the world did not buy his speech either. Even Canada and Mexico did not believe him.

I always had respect for Powel. It was obvious that he did not have facts in his UN speech.

BTW, posted by tw on 30 Dec 2001:
Quote:
The one thing I fear most, is not likely, BUT we should not be surprised if it happens - we will attack Iraq. Should it happen, it will be bad for the US, ...
In Nov 2002, when Iraq had not yet been invaded, this post was rejected by an apparent majority. Predictions based in known facts were, unfortunately, too accurate:
Quote:
Dan Rather Commentary
This attack on Iraq is chock full of surprises, unknowns, and dangers. It is what Colin Powel so strongly worried about in the 1990 Gulf War and probably still worries today in Iraq as he quitely opposes war. No clear 'end game' strategy means disaster. Exactly the problem in Somalia. Exactly Johnson's problem in VietNam. Exactly the problem in occupying Iraq.
That post was not a lucky guess. It was based in facts.

The fear was "no light at the end of the tunnel". $10billion a month and still no solution. Meanwhile the justified war will probably continue for upwards of 10 years because we invaded Iraq, did not phase four planning in Afghanistan (either), and all but protected bin Laden.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2008, 08:30 PM   #8
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by richlevy View Post
It was a great interview. I recommend everyone catch the repeats of "Meet the Press". Or just watch it here.
Powell said both McCain and Obama are competent. Powel is quite clear where his criticisms are directly. Not with McCain, other than McCain lets the problem exist. Some quotes from Powell's "Meet the Press" interview:
Quote:
I have some concerns about the direction that the party has taken in recent years. It has moved more to the right than I would like to see it, but that's a choice the party makes. ...

This Bill Ayers situation that's been going on for weeks became something of a central point of the campaign. But Mr. McCain says that he's a washed-out terrorist. Well, then, why do we keep talking about him? ...

And I think it has made the McCain campaign look a little narrow. It's not what the American people are looking for. And I look at these kinds of approaches to the campaign and they trouble me. And the party has moved even further to the right, and Governor Palin has indicated a further rightward shift. I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court, but that's what we'd be looking at in a McCain administration. I'm also troubled by, not what Senator McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said such things as, "Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim." Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim, he's a Christian. He's always been a Christian. But the really right answer is, what if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer's no, that's not America. Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president? Yet, I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion, "He's a Muslim and he might be associated terrorists." This is not the way we should be doing it in America. ...

She’s [Palin] a very distinguished woman, and she’s to be admired, but at the same time, now that we have had a chance to watch her for some seven weeks, I don’t believe she’s ready to be president of the United States, which is the job of the vice president.
The last statement is a publically correct way of calling her incompetent for the job and an example of a party moving even more extremist right.

Powel criticizes the Republican Party leadership - McCain's biggest problem.

NY Times provided an example of McCain's problem - the extremists that must be part of his campaign.
Quote:
The McCain campaign’s top foreign-policy aide is Randy Scheunemann, who was a foreign-policy adviser to former Senators Trent Lott and Bob Dole and who has longtime ties to neoconservatives. In 2002, Mr. Scheunemann was a founder of the hawkish Committee for the Liberation of Iraq and was an enthusiastic supporter of Ahmad Chalabi,
As we all know, Chalabi was a con artist who rose to power by supporting or even creating George Jr administration lies about Saddam and WMDs. He was lying so often that only those with a political agenda (rather than working for America) could have believed Chalabi. And yet Scheunemann, an example of that extremist political agenda, joins Karl Rove's people and Carly Fiorina to lead the McCain campaign.

Powell also praises Obama for his abilities to learn, inspire, comprehend, and lead. Powell uses the word "transformational".

McCain's largest problem is attributed to his right wing extremist party.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008, 07:30 AM   #9
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw View Post
More likely he knew he was lying.
Then he is definitely not a trustworthy person to listen to for an endorsement.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008, 08:54 AM   #10
Big Sarge
Werepandas - lurking in your shadows
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the Deep South
Posts: 3,408
McCain says he has the endorsement of over 200 former generals and admirals. Does anyone know where I can find a list of these supporters
Big Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008, 10:09 AM   #11
bluecuracao
in a mood, not cupcake
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,034
On his website.
bluecuracao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008, 11:01 AM   #12
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Lil more help there blue - I couldn't find them on his site either.

One interesting note though.

Comparing their myspace pages - McCain has less than 200,000 "friends" While Obama has about 750,000. Also looking at his page further confirms that he seems completely out of touch with anyone under 55. Obama has an infinitely more user friendly, visually appealing page.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008, 11:08 AM   #13
LabRat
twatfaced two legged bumhole
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
Comparing their myspace pages - McCain has less than 200,000 "friends" While Obama has about 750,000.
As someone who works on a Big Ten College campus, and sees the support that Democrats get here, and knows the likelyhood that a 20 something vs. a 30 or 40 something person would have or visit a myspace page, this does not surprise me.


Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
Also looking at his page further confirms that he seems completely out of touch with anyone under 55.
This worries me too. I want to vote for him, but he is making it very hard.
__________________
Strength does not come from how much weight you can lift, or how many miles you can run. It comes from knowing that you set a goal, and rose to the challenge. Strength comes from within.
LabRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008, 11:35 AM   #14
bluecuracao
in a mood, not cupcake
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman View Post
Lil more help there blue - I couldn't find them on his site either.
Um, no? muahahaha

Seriously though, that's a bad thing for him. They should fix that.

I found it by googling "McCain list of military endorsers," found a fun little site called stoptheaclu.com, then clicked on their link leading to the press release on his campaign site.
bluecuracao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008, 12:15 PM   #15
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Here ya go Sarge

McCain list of military endorsers
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.